What I mean is, as of now all you have to do to get a dog licence is pay $15, there is no training, no testing, and virtually no policing involved. Even if someone has abused and abandoned or created a vicious dog in the past they can still go and get a dog and a licence without any restrictions at all... This doesnt make sense to me, shouldnt we be regulating the priveledge to care for a dog that can be turned into a deadly weapon by unscrupulous people?? A motorvehicle is a deadly weapon in the wrong hands too, thats why we require people to have training in order to own and operate one, and we also have the ability to revoke the priveledge of driving if the people are dangerous or irresponsible... My question is why arent we doing the same with dogs? banning one breed out of hundreds of other large potentially deadly dogs(mutts, purebreds etc) does not keep other dogs out of the hands of irresponsible people who turn them into deadly weapons..
2007-01-23
06:55:06
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Kelly + Eternal Universal Energy
7