All of what I've seen about puppy-mills and petstores being supplied by puppy mills has been Animal Rights propiganda, or deffinantly looks like it. That said, does that mean that the deplorable conditions we've seen as puppy mills are not indeed the standard for commercial breeders?
From what I understand, and I'm new to this so correct me if I'm wrong, PETA animal rights actovists types are, as a rule, full of crap, so that would make the idea of petstore pups being from puppymills full of it, too.
Now, yes, there are pictures and clips, but there are horrible conditions out there, and that's a fact. Thing is, does photographing them and documenting them automatically make that the norm?
Sorry if I've ticked anyone off, but both sides of the issue are looking bogus. AR for obvious reasons, and purists because they really don't want any dogs running around without propper papers.
2007-01-08
15:10:05
·
16 answers
·
asked by
mandy
3