I am not one of those "all dogs are nice and only their owners make them bad" kind of people. I know that certain breeds are more dominant and powerful than others, therefore making them more prone to becoming attackers. But, instead of banning these breeds, why not make requirements. Like if you want a pit, fine, but you must get your dog from a breeder(that is on file) to prevent getting puppies from those who breed fighters, and the you must attend extensive training classes with your dog, it must pass and be fixed, unless you plan to breed, then you have to register. The cost of all this should be included in the adoption fee.
It would discourage those who buy these dogs on a whim or a "guard"dogs to live on a chain their whole lives, as it is a lot of work, and if they didn't do all this, they wouldn't get the dog. What do you all think would be involved in getting a law like this passed, and would it be successful?
2007-01-08
12:42:21
·
12 answers
·
asked by
♪Majestik moose© ★is preggers★
5