Ok, first of all I am against breeding dogs because there are already enough dogs that deserve loving homes and have none. Nevertheless, I have a question... I have noticed alot of dog people bashing others for not having their pets spayed/neutered, and i have noticed that their is alot of intolerance towards people who have dogs that arent fixed, but are not allowed to reproduce. I can understand being angry at someone for conciously contributing to the pet overpopulation accidentally or irresponsibly. What I am asking is, what reason is there to bash someone who decides to have an unaltered dog that is never allowed to reproduce, or if they are it will be planned, and all the pups and parents will be cared for lifelong by the dogs caretaker. In case of accidents owner also takes full responsibility for the lifelong care of all offspring. So what is wrong with not contributing to the shelter problem, but still having an unaltered dog? If all the dogs are guaranteed lifelong care
2007-02-16
17:35:03
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Kelly + Eternal Universal Energy
7