Law & Ethics - September 2006

he got drunk one night and called twice, the second time he talked for 12 minutes claming to be god but he called from a cell phone in a moving vehicle, then when we broke up he said im the one who called? could i get in trouble too??

2006-09-11 05:23:03 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have a verbal contract with a lawyer in the amount of 10,000 to be payed 1,000 per month for 10 months. in return, the lawyer has agreed to represent my husband. the lawyer has done a less than acceptable job of representation but still i paid him 1,000 per month for the first 8 month's. i am currently 2 months behind and financially unable to pay him the remaining 2,000 at this time. my husband will be sentenced on the 15th of this month and the lawyer says he will not show up if i do not pay him the balance. does he have the right to not show up in court.

2006-09-11 05:21:09 · 15 answers · asked by EricaS 2

2006-09-11 05:02:47 · 2 answers · asked by iluvhipos 3

i have been charged witha class h felony in the state of north carolina by obtaining money under false pretenses. i was just wondering what will be the most likely outcome?

2006-09-11 05:00:06 · 4 answers · asked by sknygurl022002 2

i live in a housing assocation house on an estate and have had problems with anti social behavior damage to property cars groups of uncontroleble tenents children bullying and abusing my children my 7 year old has been bullyied and beaten bikes stolen i could go on and on i am now in the prosess of moving because ive had enough ive even paid someone £2000 to exchange home with me i have tried to contact my housing association and complain many times only to be ignored they dont even get back to me i feel this is a brech of tenentcy contract which promised to give us a safe enviroment to live can i sue them for 7 years of hell

2006-09-11 04:58:26 · 18 answers · asked by Rawz 2

I am in a bit of a dispute with the IRS and they have informed me they are placing a lien against my "property and assets" (which are essentially non-existent by the way) and it would also cover any property I might acquire in the future. This action would also be reported to my creditors. Is it legal, or customary to place a lien on something and not specify what it is? My thoughts on this is it is equalivent to a DA seeking a warrant on someone for "anything you ever did or might do in the future". Right, wrong? Anyone??

2006-09-11 04:52:05 · 5 answers · asked by jberrie33 2

Disclaimer--- I'm not sure where this question would go cause I couldn't find a women's study section but this past weekend I was at a friend's wedding when I met another friend of mine who told me she was being abused by her husband but she didn't want to leave him cause of her 4 year old son. I told her to take action but she said she's conflicted cause she still loves her husband. I know she's also the type of person to be really scared of offending anyone.
What can be done here?
Why doesn't our government have services for women, say in schools to make it mandatory that men don't physically abuse them?
We talked till 3 am and I left depressed for her.

2006-09-11 04:51:49 · 12 answers · asked by Egroeg_Rorepme 4

2006-09-11 04:35:10 · 7 answers · asked by I love angels 2

2006-09-11 04:27:55 · 6 answers · asked by iluvhipos 3

to caught corrupt leader and beurocrates.both are above law and collacting black money
poor indian can not progress

2006-09-11 04:23:19 · 4 answers · asked by dr b 2

2006-09-11 04:11:51 · 3 answers · asked by morfi 1

Say, for example, regarding muslim and jewish communities in the french Republic- where in accordance with the 'republican model' all people are equal regardless of religion- thus banning the 'foulard' and other religous attire from schools.

2006-09-11 03:52:52 · 6 answers · asked by pseudoname 3

2006-09-11 03:45:00 · 10 answers · asked by katie d 1

I returned a few things to CompUSA about a week ago and I should have gotten back a gift card for about $800 but the woman who did the return did not really know what she was doing and she gave me three gift cards totaling about $1150. I noticed what she had done and went back to the store the next day and spoke to one of the managers and told her what happened and she went over the transactions and could not find a mistake. I dont think she really knew what she was doing. But I still know that they gave me back way to much money. Is there anything illegal about this on my part. Or is it just moral. Thank you very much.

2006-09-11 03:32:42 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Animal activists fall victim to new law designed to protect profit generating animal enterprises...

Watch this video and make up your mind about it at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPtKOz2Zouo&search=animal%20terrorist

2006-09-11 03:31:59 · 9 answers · asked by Ricardo P 3

Nav Sats are just as dangerous while driving as using a mobile because you have to take your eyes off the road.

2006-09-11 03:29:58 · 9 answers · asked by pddut 1

if she is 16 and i m 18, we live in minnesota.

2006-09-11 03:17:37 · 4 answers · asked by ngan b 1

Just a question to see what everyone's opinion is on the subject...

2006-09-11 03:17:16 · 16 answers · asked by petalfushia 2

In most of the western world you can not really say what you mean anymore, although we have this so called freedom of speach.

2006-09-11 03:02:58 · 12 answers · asked by Dirk d 1

The holiday in question is August 15th. In New Brunswick the Acadians are trying to get a statutory holiday that is only for them. So therefore they get stat pay and time and a half when their English counterparts must work and not get statutory pay or time and a half. How is that fair? Is it not rasicm? They have been granted more than the English people as long as I can remember. They get government funding for Acadian Day Festivities but the government has denied funding St. Patrick's Day Festivities. In my opinon this is too much!

I have no problem with August 15th becoming a stat holiday but it should be for EVERYONE! Non-Christians have Easter as a statutory holiday, how is this any different?

PS: Please read the question THROUGHLY before answering. I am not whining thank you very much this is a valid question. Why is their request even GOING THROUGH to be voted on and possibly passed? If they're allowed to get away with this what does it say about Canada?

2006-09-11 03:01:47 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-11 02:54:10 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

yes or no?

2006-09-11 02:36:44 · 20 answers · asked by princessnicola23 3

If you have no independant third party to witness a conversation may you covertly tape record it and use it as evidence in any later court proceedings (under UK law). Is this legal?

2006-09-11 02:31:54 · 23 answers · asked by allanperkins2001@btinternet.com 1

has to do with the court system. it is based on felony drug charges

2006-09-11 01:12:35 · 5 answers · asked by chicana68_2000 1

A munter is about to start work next to me in the office.......is there anything I can legally do about it?

2006-09-10 23:56:42 · 7 answers · asked by Farmer Phil 2

Is a Universal Life Church minister able to officiate a marriage ceremony legally in Pennsylvania? If so, what is the procedure for doing so?

2006-09-10 23:47:53 · 6 answers · asked by Out $1000 3

vast changes in civil right and civil liberties, and President's Reagan four Supreme Court appointees????

2006-09-10 23:47:02 · 3 answers · asked by alfonso 5

2006-09-10 23:41:46 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

In wisconsin, (on a month-to-month rental) if a landlord excepts the following months rent but gives the tenant, after taking the money, an eviction notice for that month he just took the rent for, Does the tenant still have to move out the same month? (Example: Paid the rent for sept,2006,after landlord took the money Sept,1,served the tenant an eviction notice dated Aug.31,2006 stating that they must be moved out Oct.1, 2006) Do they have to move and if not what action can they take?

2006-09-10 23:37:38 · 7 answers · asked by witch_wicked_1 1

Currently the UK runs an opt-in system, where people who want to become organ donors carry donor cards and tell their relatives of their wishes. The opt out system would mean that, when people died, their organs would be automatically considered for transplant unless the person had explicitly expressed otherwise? Is this a fairer system?

2006-09-10 23:15:23 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous