English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 11 May 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

2007-05-11 12:00:37 · 16 answers · asked by fullstruttt 1 in Politics

They finally got rid of it in 2000 and even then about 40% of them voted to keep the ban.

They sure seem to love their conservative "traditional values" down there.

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/11/07/alabama.interracial/

2007-05-11 11:59:25 · 6 answers · asked by trovalta_stinks_2 3 in Politics

2007-05-11 11:56:49 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

It seems that if you have the money you can pollute all you want to as long as you pay for "carbon offsets". In Al Gore's case from Generation Investment Management a company he helped found. He won't even take the pledge he askes everyone else to take. What you think? I'm not looking for a debate on whether or not "global warming" is real or not or man made or not. Thanks.

2007-05-11 11:53:45 · 11 answers · asked by John r 6 in Elections

Septemper 11th, 2001.
We were so pissed that we just took over a country. Then 2 years later we were still mad so we took over another one. I mean looked what happened to Japan in World War 2. 2 cities wiped off the map. And in Vietnam, we may have loss (due to liberlias in Washington), but we ****** up Hanio pretty bad. We are occuping the countrys around them, for Christs sake! Sure we may have some problems with insurgancy but still, we could topple Irans goverment in 3 mounths. I guss what i'm saying is don't make the USA mad, or we'll blow up some stuff.

2007-05-11 11:52:53 · 13 answers · asked by Bradford A 1 in Military

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070511/ts_nm/iraq1_dc;_ylt=AszF.2rzoOV7d98ekNH3LD7MWM0F

2007-05-11 11:50:57 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

...I personally clicked many (I stopped counting at 55) responces that talked about what a traitor she is, or that she should have learned better from her parents.

2007-05-11 11:49:48 · 10 answers · asked by Caly 4 in Law & Ethics

2007-05-11 11:44:21 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

Or at least misuse of the mouse?

2007-05-11 11:42:37 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

I'm not supposed to have any kids?
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21684156-5009760,00.html

Someone want to tell me what the point is anyway?

2007-05-11 11:40:32 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

The US has plans to control space with their STARWARS program or NMD and if it becomes a reality, the US would be the total dictator of the planet we all call home. It would mean total control of all sea, land, air, space and cybersp ace, which in reality means total and absolute control over the planet and of course the ability to strike at other countries without fear of retaliation. WORLD DOMINANCE was on the agenda the moment they withdrew unilaterally from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty which has banned the so called Starwars program.Does it means that the planet as a whole agrees to be under the dictate of the US and how so?

2007-05-11 11:40:17 · 18 answers · asked by D greendesk 3 in Law & Ethics

Please give specific policy platforms that support your answer. Please do not reference another party. Thank you!

2007-05-11 11:39:51 · 8 answers · asked by Arbgre555 5 in Politics

If I want to phone the police to report noisy neighbours late at night (ie: now) is it best to call the local station or 999?

2007-05-11 11:37:19 · 34 answers · asked by truesdale s 2 in Law Enforcement & Police

The Documentary was to show how good the Cuban Health Service is.....

Is this the Land of the Free, Home of the Brave or was that before the Bush administration came to power?

Who is next.. Patriot Act at play I see....

2007-05-11 11:29:54 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

package being sent from Syracuse, N.Y. to Bridgewater, Nova Scotia, Canada

2007-05-11 11:23:25 · 14 answers · asked by dudenell 3 in International Organizations

When did the American born family unit become a disposable commodity? When did racial diversity replace the value of moral dedication to our own children? When did the statement Justice Is Blind come to be translated as blind to the Law? Moreover, when did serving the Law replace serving the public?

2007-05-11 11:18:37 · 9 answers · asked by topcat 2 in Immigration

Can't a man stand up for his people without people being jealous?

2007-05-11 11:14:33 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Sharpton, Falwell, Swaggart, Haggart, Robertson, Jackson, Roberts, etc.

Who are they to tell anyone how to live their lives?

2007-05-11 11:13:12 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Would you call the law and have them arrested? Would you just decide well that's just their way, and since they are an elite group of hillbillies, it's okay? Would you be appalled if you knew these hillbillies and they were in charge of leading our World? Look up Bohemian Grove on Google, or go to www.infowars.com, see how you would feel than answer the question, what would you do? There is some reading involved, so if your not much on reading, you may want to pass.

2007-05-11 11:12:01 · 10 answers · asked by Coulterbasher01 4 in Politics

I talk to people everyday that is upset with our nation's policies on illegal immigration. We elected a bunch of officials to do a job that they are not doing effectively. It's almost like we forgot the first three words in the constitution are " we the people". It is us that govern this nation. So I am just curious with all this frustration why aren't we doing anything about it. Why are we waiting for officials to do something about this. Why are we not using our freedoms to assemble and protest while we share our freedoms with the illegal immigrants. What are you doing to prevent this national crisis?

2007-05-11 11:10:14 · 9 answers · asked by Jo W 2 in Other - Politics & Government

Some people keep saying about Iraq: "I don't support the war, I don't like the way the war is being is conducted, but I support our troops." What the heck does that mean? The war is why those soldiers are there, right? So you don't support why they're there, but you support them being there? Hell, I think Iraq is Vietnam all over again, and I don't support it, but do people agree the reasoning of supporting one but not the other is bizarre? I mean, if you don't support what they're fighting for, aren't they pretty demoralised when they hear that, so you aren't really supporting them?

2007-05-11 11:08:10 · 16 answers · asked by Sam S 2 in Military

2007-05-11 11:05:40 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

From Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics

Politics is the process by which groups of people make decisions. It is the authoritative allocation of values. Although the term is generally applied to behavior within governments, politics is observed in all human group interactions, including corporate, academic, and religious institutions.

So, how do we take "dirty" away from a word that is so important to the continuation of our democratic way of life?

2007-05-11 11:05:09 · 2 answers · asked by Beach Saint 7 in Politics

What happens to those few last soldiers waiting for a ride home? They will be defenseless and vulnerable.

Wouldn't it be better to sneak out all at once unannounced?
I mean that is if it is our plan to cut and run.

2007-05-11 11:03:51 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

Just want to know how bad it's going to be. I have my plastic and duct tape like Dick said I should.

2007-05-11 11:03:19 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Traitors to our Country should not be featured on this website.

2007-05-11 10:59:20 · 16 answers · asked by ChaosSounds 3 in Military

US generals before & during the Iraq war have all said that in order to win Bush needs to have AT LEAST 300,000 US troops in Iraq.

The maximum amount of US troops in Iraq under Bush has been no more than about 160,000.

So unless for some reason you didn't make it past the 3rd grade, if you can't see the futility of US efforts in Iraq, then you are a bigger fool than Bush.

2007-05-11 10:58:51 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

fedest.com, questions and answers