Since most of you don't advocate animal cruelty in any form, or even ear-cropping or tail-docking (by licensed vetrenarians) in the least -- citing things like: "it's mutilation of the dog and very painful", Then my question is, why do you then advocate getting your dog "fixed", seeing that it's mutilating the dog's genitals, and an even MORE painful and uncomfortable experience for the dog than getting ears cropped? Incidently, I've got my pit bulls both fixed, and ears cropped, and I'm curious as to why most of you assert that any form of "dog mutilation" is bad -- while advocating canine genital mutilation? My dogs were in alot more pain after being spayed than when I had their ears cropped.
2007-01-30
10:02:12
·
25 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous