Religion & Spirituality - 14 July 2007

Or will he be condemned to a life of failure and misery.?

2007-07-14 17:09:54 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-14 17:07:09 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

if you put a sign on a church that said "Live Nude Girls" on it more men would show up on sundays instead of watching football?

2007-07-14 17:07:03 · 6 answers · asked by terry o 2

2007-07-14 17:06:26 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-14 17:06:06 · 20 answers · asked by I WALK FUNNY 4

Without any doubt, the New Testament is crystal clear in its opposition to the death penalty. Killing is wrong. We must love our enemies. We are to return aggression and hostility with love, forgiveness, and kindness. We are not to judge others either.

There's just no way that the Bible can be used to justify a policy of capital punishment. It was allowed in the Old Testament, but it is totally turned upside down in the New Testament.

2007-07-14 17:04:55 · 13 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1

Well, yes, I guess I will. I could just reply, “Well, you won’t be a believer when you’re not burning in hell.” But that somehow lacks the punch of a truly powerful answer. If I “wake up” in hell, whatever that is, I expect that would be enough evidence for me to become a believer. And it may seem odd or even unfair that, if the Christian is right, he and I will presumably both find out that he is right, while not the opposite. (If the secular humanist/atheistic position is the right one, neither secular humanist nor Christian will “find out” anything after death.) But no one should mistake such a point for evidence that counts in favor of the believer being right.

When a religionist declares that I’ll become a believer when I’m suffering eternal torture, it does lead to a couple of interesting questions to ask him: 1. “Why is your god so sadistic as to provide conclusive evidence only after condemning me to endless unimaginable suffering, while giving me no credible evidence while

2007-07-14 17:03:43 · 20 answers · asked by Jack Rivall 3

There are debates about EVERYTHING when it comes to quality vs. quantity. If I had 10 cheap, simple Bibles, would that be any better than 1 expensive, elegent Bible; or vice versa?

Does it make a difference?

2007-07-14 17:03:30 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I really can't put what I'm trying to say to words correctly, so, bear with me, people.

Basically... Okay. I'm Pagan (Eclectic). I feel that, hey, I have my own personal experience with the Divine which shapes the way I portray it in my mind's eye. I feel that it is impossible to have the exact same concept of the Divine among two people, even twins, because of different interactions.

I also feel that Atheists (yes, I capitalized the "a", I expect to be hearing from you guys for that) have an interaction with the Divine through another name, a la Science.

And I feel and respect everyone for having their own experience in their own way.

... but why can't some people just get off other people's backs when it comes to how they view the Divine? Can't they just say, "Hey, that's cool, you experience the Divine through Allah, God, G-d, Yahweh, Zues, Loki, Danu, Artemis, Aphrodite, Luna, Science, etc., and I'm glad your connection with it is strong?"

2007-07-14 17:03:09 · 14 answers · asked by Lady Myrkr 6

how can i tell my friend god doesnt exist or how can i piss him off b.c i belive in ailens and evloution and the earth is more then 7000 years old how can i prove this to him ro just make him think a little im not a expert on these things. can anyone help so some examples of the things i said and about evolution and god and stuff like that.

2007-07-14 17:00:11 · 22 answers · asked by geff 1

Exactly what is the difference between intellect, knowledge, and wisdom. I would argue:

1. Intellect: mental horse power
2. Knowledge: accumulation of information
3. Wisdom: Right application if intellect and knowledge into action.

What would your definition be?

Kind and funny answers only please.

2007-07-14 17:00:01 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-14 16:57:23 · 27 answers · asked by NIHIL VERUM NISI MORS 2

I didn't know anything about Mormons until I got HBO and was able to see, "Big Love" and it's companion documentary. But those Mormons live on compounds.

Pleeeez don't say that FLDS live on compunds and LDS live on wards because that doesn't answer my question does it?

2007-07-14 16:52:44 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Joseph Smith was giving a "revalation" to practice polygamy in 1843. In 1844 was charged with adultery and under oath said the following:

"What a thing it is for a man to be accused of committing adultery, and having seven wives, when I can ony find one." -History of the Church vol. 6, p 411.

Why is he lying. Only a false prophet would like a deny what God command.

Published in "Times and Seasons" on Thursday, Feb 01, 1844 this was written and signed by Jospeh Smith:

"As we have lately been credibly informed, that an Elder of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, by the name of Hirum Brown, has been preaching polygamy, and other false and corrupt doctrines, in the county of Lapeer, state of Michigan.

This is to notify him and the church in general, that he as been cut off from the church, for his iniquity; and he is further notified to appear at the Spiecal Conference on the 6th of April next, to make answer to these charges."

2007-07-14 16:52:31 · 3 answers · asked by shadowboxer78 2

(crafty and sneaky) they will never know

2007-07-14 16:51:57 · 10 answers · asked by TTC 3

Doesn't it feel good to be free of spiritual oppression?

2007-07-14 16:50:38 · 26 answers · asked by Ghost Wolf 6

The concept of a “burden of proof” is important in debates — whoever has a burden of proof is obligated to “prove” their claims in some fashion. If someone doesn’t have a burden of proof, then their job is much easier: all that is required is to either accept the claims or point out where they are inadequately supported.

It is thus no surprise that many debates, including those between atheists and theists, involve secondary discussions over who has the burden of proof and why. When people are unable to reach some sort of agreement on that issue, it can be very difficult for the rest of the debate to accomplish much. Therefore, it is often a good idea to try to define in advance who has the burden of proof.

The first thing to keep in mind is that the phrase “burden of proof” is a bit more extreme than what is often needed in reality.

2007-07-14 16:48:52 · 19 answers · asked by Jack Rivall 3

Isn't a righteous life neccessary to see God.??

2007-07-14 16:48:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Just one PLEASE i beg of you- and don’t say 'this person' give me a resource.

We do not think he is God, nor is he better then us. He is like the president of the church only we do not get to vote. Everything needs order that includes ORGANIZED religion.

2007-07-14 16:48:00 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

...even though he created it?

2007-07-14 16:47:23 · 11 answers · asked by Bouken SocratiCat 6

2007-07-14 16:45:48 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-14 16:45:10 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

There's a waterstain (it looks like a ghost) under the expressway near my house and there was some religious who-haa about it. People (mostly latinos) came from miles around to pray and give flowers and light candles and whatnot. It was all over the news and was very serious.

Now, some time has passed and I never see anyone there. There is a shrine of plastic flowers and a grouping of long burned out candles. The waterstain is still there.

Do you think it was wrong for these people to abandon "Our Lady of Lime Deposit" like that?

><>J

2007-07-14 16:44:33 · 11 answers · asked by Just! Some? *Dude* 5

This wasn't something I was born with, but developed after experiencing hormonal problems. The area on my nose looks odd, and I want to get rid of it..but nothing has worked. Now, I just want to cover it up. I'm not getting it for any other reason, and when I was younger..I did not have this problem. So, I wouldn't be changing what Allah swt naturally gave to me.

2007-07-14 16:44:30 · 9 answers · asked by Mortabi d 1

I am specifically asking this to atheists. But I didn't want to be like so many people and say, "ATHEISTS??? What do you think about this??"
I am coming into this with the assumption that it is "to be happy and enjoy life." Am I totally off base, any different opinions or what?

2007-07-14 16:43:35 · 16 answers · asked by The GMC 6

don't u think that god is just something WE people think exists?well,i am half atheist,..

2007-07-14 16:42:28 · 16 answers · asked by amutha a 1

2007-07-14 16:42:24 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

When he says that theirs is the only true religion.

2007-07-14 16:41:45 · 11 answers · asked by Mr. Bodhisattva 6

Jesus or Mr. Clean?

2007-07-14 16:40:08 · 27 answers · asked by Mo 2

2007-07-14 16:40:05 · 6 answers · asked by Ariel 128 5