That the argument that the Bible isnt true becuase it was written hundreds of years after the events,is really a dumb and not very well thought out argument?Cuase obviously none of the people are thinking about writing down the events of their lives as their living it in the present;it would make sense that someone would write it down later.Then of course they didnt have the best technology or materials then to mass produce stuff like we do now,&of course didnt have bikes,cars or any type of advanced transportation.Last,the people&places being true,people later in the future wouldnt know the details of peoples lives that came long before them;so it would make sense that the authors truely had to be inspired by God, to know about the people,places&details of peoples lives that came long before they were born.
Again,is it just me, or is the argument the Bible was written hundreds of years later a bad¬ well thought out argument?
2007-05-04
17:15:14
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Maurice H
6