The obvious notwithstanding, more than half of us have, at some point or another, been hoodwinked into believing this particular line of reasoning. The fault lies generally not with the believer, or even, as in the case of some rare instances, the one perpetrating the myth. What it really comes down to is a willingness on behalf of both parties to engage in a form of, for lack of a better term, "mutual encouragement", that leads to a blurred line between fact and fiction. I think in most cases, malicious intent is a secondary factor, if it exists at all. My primary concern, of course, are those situations wherein malicious intent is a significant contributing factor to the speed with which these ideas permeate our culture.
These are trying times, and I hope people are adequately equipped in terms of both foresight and insight to determine the difference betweeen rational discourse and a pep rally.
I'd love to know what you guys think of this matter.
2007-03-19
12:05:16
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous