Law & Ethics - December 2006

In the constitution of the United States of America. All us Citizens are given the right to keep and bear arms. For the defence of both the nation and there one person and property. By what authority does a state of the United States have any legal power to require any addition restraints on this Constituation right such as requiring that a person be trained in the use of fire arms or that a fire arm be registered or that the firearm by in plain sight. Note by what power is the state government amending the constituation.

2006-12-16 16:22:11 · 5 answers · asked by Thomas A 2

It's complete BS and makes no sense! So why?

2006-12-16 16:10:37 · 7 answers · asked by ? 1

im doing a survey for school on what people think about families that adopt children that are of a different race or background.
1. how old are you?
2. what is your background?
3. do you have any children?
4. if so how many, and how old are they?
5. would you consider adoption?
6. would you adopt a child of a different background or ethnicity than your self?
7. how do you feel about others who adopt a child of a different background or ethnicity?

2006-12-16 16:06:29 · 5 answers · asked by craftyttangl254 2

Okay....say in Fantasy City.....you had in it 2 powerful gangs....disregarding originality we'll say crips and bloods. In the past they've fueded relentlessy over who's gonna control the streets...and for a moment the crips had a hold over the bloods to the point the bloods were almost slaves to them. Well needing help, a police force well known from another city came in to help calm down the chaos in this city with seriously high crime rates. What turned out was the bloods being givin some freedom to roam the streets again. But out of vindictive hatred decided to wreak havoc on the crips. Of course, the crips, not letting this happen, retaliate. So now there is a HUGE gang war in this city. As the police force what would you do? (i'm pretty sure you can hint where i'm getting at....but maybe the different perspective may give some incite i suppose...so here goes :-). ).

2006-12-16 16:04:26 · 3 answers · asked by Dennis 6

I bought a computer on ebay and never received it now I have filed a claim for a refund.

2006-12-16 15:48:38 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

The links are garbled and may be malicious in nature.

2006-12-16 15:47:42 · 12 answers · asked by nonamespleze 1

Preamble: John, by the grace of God, king of England, lord of Ireland, duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, and count of Anjou, to the archbishop, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justiciaries, foresters, sheriffs, stewards, servants, and to all his bailiffs and liege subjects, greetings. Know that, having regard to God and for the salvation of our soul, and those of all our ancestors and heirs, and unto the honor of God and the advancement of his holy Church and for the rectifying of our realm, we have granted as underwritten by advice of our venerable fathers, Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England and cardinal of the holy Roman Church, Henry, archbishop of Dublin, William of London, Peter of Winchester, Jocelyn of Bath and Glastonbury, Hugh of Lincoln, Walter of Worcester, William of Coventry, Benedict of Rochester, bishops; of Master Pandulf, subdeacon and member of the household of our lord the Pope, of brother Aymeric (master of the Knights of the Temple in England), and of the illustrious men William Marshal, earl of Pembroke, William, earl of Salisbury, William, earl of Warenne, William, earl of Arundel, Alan of Galloway (constable of Scotland), Waren Fitz Gerold, Peter Fitz Herbert, Hubert De Burgh (seneschal of Poitou), Hugh de Neville, Matthew Fitz Herbert, Thomas Basset, Alan Basset, Philip d'Aubigny, Robert of Roppesley, John Marshal, John Fitz Hugh, and others, our liegemen.

1. In the first place we have granted to God, and by this our present charter confirmed for us and our heirs forever that the English Church shall be free, and shall have her rights entire, and her liberties inviolate; and we will that it be thus observed; which is apparent from this that the freedom of elections, which is reckoned most important and very essential to the English Church, we, of our pure and unconstrained will, did grant, and did by our charter confirm and did obtain the ratification of the same from our lord, Pope Innocent III, before the quarrel arose between us and our barons: and this we will observe, and our will is that it be observed in good faith by our heirs forever. We have also granted to all freemen of our kingdom, for us and our heirs forever, all the underwritten liberties, to be had and held by them and their heirs, of us and our heirs forever.

8. No widow shall be compelled to marry, so long as she prefers to live without a husband; provided always that she gives security not to marry without our consent, if she holds of us, or without the consent of the lord of whom she holds, if she holds of another.

9. Neither we nor our bailiffs will seize any land or rent for any debt, as long as the chattels of the debtor are sufficient to repay the debt; nor shall the sureties of the debtor be distrained so long as the principal debtor is able to satisfy the debt; and if the principal debtor shall fail to pay the debt, having nothing wherewith to pay it, then the sureties shall answer for the debt; and let them have the lands and rents of the debtor, if they desire them, until they are indemnified for the debt which they have paid for him, unless the principal debtor can show proof that he is discharged thereof as against the said sureties.

12. No scutage not aid shall be imposed on our kingdom, unless by common counsel of our kingdom, except for ransoming our person, for making our eldest son a knight, and for once marrying our eldest daughter; and for these there shall not be levied more than a reasonable aid. In like manner it shall be done concerning aids from the city of London.

13. And the city of London shall have all it ancient liberties and free customs, as well by land as by water; furthermore, we decree and grant that all other cities, boroughs, towns, and ports shall have all their liberties and free customs.

17. Common pleas shall not follow our court, but shall be held in some fixed place.

18. Inquests of novel disseisin, of mort d'ancestor, and of darrein presentment shall not be held elsewhere than in their own county courts, and that in manner following; We, or, if we should be out of the realm, our chief justiciar, will send two justiciaries through every county four times a year, who shall alone with four knights of the county chosen by the county, hold the said assizes in the county court, on the day and in the place of meeting of that court.


23. No village or individual shall be compelled to make bridges at river banks, except those who from of old were legally bound to do so.

24. No sheriff, constable, coroners, or others of our bailiffs, shall hold pleas of our Crown.

28. No constable or other bailiff of ours shall take corn or other provisions from anyone without immediately tendering money therefor, unless he can have postponement thereof by permission of the seller.

30. No sheriff or bailiff of ours, or other person, shall take the horses or carts of any freeman for transport duty, against the will of the said freeman.

31. Neither we nor our bailiffs shall take, for our castles or for any other work of ours, wood which is not ours, against the will of the owner of that wood.

35. Let there be one measure of wine throughout our whole realm; and one measure of ale; and one measure of corn, to wit, "the London quarter"; and one width of cloth (whether dyed, or russet, or "halberget"), to wit, two ells within the selvedges; of weights also let it be as of measures.

38. No bailiff for the future shall, upon his own unsupported complaint, put anyone to his "law", without credible witnesses brought for this purposes.

39. No freemen shall be taken or imprisoned or disseised or exiled or in any way destroyed, nor will we go upon him nor send upon him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.
40. To no one will we sell, to no one will we refuse or delay, right or justice.

45. We will appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or bailiffs only such as know the law of the realm and mean to observe it well.

54. No one shall be arrested or imprisoned upon the appeal of a woman, for the death of any other than her husband

63. Wherefore we will and firmly order that the English Church be free, and that the men in our kingdom have and hold all the aforesaid liberties, rights, and concessions, well and peaceably, freely and quietly, fully and wholly, for themselves and their heirs, of us and our heirs, in all respects and in all places forever, as is aforesaid. An oath, moreover, has been taken, as well on our part as on the art of the barons, that all these conditions aforesaid shall be kept in good faith and without evil intent.

2006-12-16 15:37:42 · 2 answers · asked by js_batres 2

2006-12-16 15:31:55 · 6 answers · asked by atlyata 1

Anyone did these before? What type of identification and release forms need to be done before filming the models and making movies?

2006-12-16 13:45:28 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

at first I thought why would someone lie about such a thing.....But I changed my mind when they announced that they found 5 different mens semen from her rape test results

2006-12-16 13:42:29 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

If someone brought a court case against you, do you had to have a solicitor to defend you? Can you just ignore it? (court hearing date has been set on next month, but I really don’t to pay the solicitor bill - £25,000 which is exactly all we have left). Ex wife (no children involved) does it anytime she wants – Even after paying her 5 years maintenance already. Help!

2006-12-16 13:42:03 · 5 answers · asked by aoilondon 1

I am looking for an up to date book/directory of all the prvt. practicing Attorneys in ca. - where can I get it?

2006-12-16 13:32:42 · 3 answers · asked by cinthia77 1

2006-12-16 13:13:32 · 8 answers · asked by phantom_steel1988 2

I have athma and suffer from fatiuge. There is a product that the convenience stores around me sell that helps calm my athma and helps ward off my fatiuge. The product contains ephidrine(a bronchial dialator) and Guaffenasine(an expectorant). Today when I whent to buy it the cashier informed me of a new law which says that to buy the product I had to present to my drivers license which she took and wrote its information in a book. I asked why and she said it is a form of control.(What does that mean?). Governmental control? The information she wrote in the book - how is that going to be used? Who gets it and why? Do "They" think they are going find me and kick my *** because I use the product? (I hope they try!) or to count me as a criminal? If a criminal, who did I commit the crime against? And if it is a crime to use the product, why are they letting it be sold OTC? Are they just after me or are there others they are after? I hope it is only me! Signed: You know who...Me! hehehe.

2006-12-16 12:59:23 · 6 answers · asked by Retsu1 1

Electric Chair?
Lethal Injection?
Other Methods?

2006-12-16 12:57:59 · 12 answers · asked by Frank 1

The car ruined that part of my garden, ran over antique metal pail that was my grandpa's, rusted out nails and boards sticking up all over the place for someone inc. me to step on. I need surgery on my neck and am extremely limited to anything anymore. Family knows about it and I'm sure seen damages. Family was notified at time of accident. 911 was called as well. It's been 1.5 weeks. A couple people came out and took pictures of the dent on the house, but nothing regarding cleanup. There are heavy logs and marble stepping stones to move back, etc. I'm restricted to lifting only 2.3 lbs. per my doctor. What should I do? I asked twice about it already. Should I withhold rent, etc.? Help! It's a mess. Who cleans and can I get reimbursed for my plants and garden ornaments, etc?

2006-12-16 12:29:52 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

i need to know how its enforced and its effectiveness

2006-12-16 12:23:28 · 2 answers · asked by waxie73 1

2006-12-16 12:04:47 · 10 answers · asked by akbar_majid_asad 1

I live on a corner, (property owner)and a gas pipeline company has informed me that they will be destroying my yard, is there anything I can do? Dont they have to at least compensate me to at least replace the grass and soil? there are no easments to my property, they are claiming right of way from the 2 roads?

2006-12-16 12:04:29 · 3 answers · asked by fighterace26 3

then it is reasonable to believe that God would not favor a man that would go against the laws of man. Any man that breaks the laws of man is considered a criminal in the eyes of the law of man.

We could drastically reduce the number of criminals by simply updating the antiquated laws of man. Many laws were written more for the protection of horses from the automobile on streets that don't often see horses these days.

These are not the only laws that create criminals by the thousand every day. Just because it's not prosecuted doesn't prevent them from breaking the laws and ignorance of the law is no excuse for criminals according to the law.

Why should God have to deal with habitual offenders every time he talks to a man?

2006-12-16 12:03:19 · 7 answers · asked by old_brain 5

Yeah, there's a few organizations out there who speak against it and try to pass tougher legislation but it's not enough. "Don't Drink and Drive" is a nice little phrase that doesn't really drive the point home either. What can we do to help our culture realize and behave in a way that acknowledges how potentially dangerous, deadly, and devastating driving under the influence really is?

2006-12-16 11:53:07 · 9 answers · asked by broham85 3

Are there abandoned mailboxes? This might be the issue why I sent a payment in a envelope to someone on Monday and the seller says he still hasn't receieved it. He told me there can be abandoned mailboxes where the mail rarely gets picked up by the postmen. Is that true?

2006-12-16 11:34:41 · 3 answers · asked by Yahoo! King 1

I've been terminated from my job at a new hair salon. I sent out notices, placed ads, and printed flyers to all of my clients. I worked at this salon for only 3 weeks. I was very professional and never seen this coming. She terminated my employment because " I was making her staff feel uncomfortable about asking how their walk in system works." 2 members of the staff is just starting out & need walk ins to build clientelle. I was told when I was hired that they needed to give these customers to them because that's what they needed for them to build. I understood this however I had a very slow start. Everyday that I've been there, only a few of my clients have been showing up. I never objected this but did start asking questions once I realized I wasn't making enough money. She also said that a client of hers said something to her about my previous place of employment that she found disturbing. I asked her what was said but she won't tell me. Is there anything I can do?

2006-12-16 11:29:06 · 2 answers · asked by Ida 3

2006-12-16 11:27:22 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

If a politician introduces a bill just to "make a point" or for "showboating" with no intention of actually having it passed as Cynthia McKinney and Charley Rangle keep doing, should they have to pay the costs for having that legisaltion drawn up and considered by Congress out of their pockets instead of being paid for by the tax payers?

2006-12-16 11:26:09 · 4 answers · asked by HoneyC 2

Various forms of surveillance have been ongoing for some time now, including phones, following, trespassing within our fenced property and deck, utilizing neighboring properties and locations to photograph & film--What are our rights? How can we find out who is harassing us & why--and stop them!?

2006-12-16 11:25:52 · 5 answers · asked by lou n 1

What are the questions they ask you because i want to have an idea and to prepare my self on whats coming

2006-12-16 11:15:40 · 4 answers · asked by gurly girl 1

As a supposed Free Country, do you think that Religion should play a role in the governing of the laws of this country? With such a melting pot of Religions and Beleifs, is it justifiable to bring those views and vote or make legislation based on Religious influence or is it best left as the constitution states. The Governement is supposed to be seperate from Federal Govt vs the Church. I feel it is a politicians duty to vote and serve the feeling of the community or state they represent and not vote their own consious beyond their own personal vote we each get. Shouldnt politicians be made to vote the way the majority of their constituents want? After all they are there to serve the people not themselves. I think too many have agendas when instead they should not be influenced by their Faith or by their consious, but have to vote the way the Majority of the area the represent. That would be true Democracy. What are some of your thoughts on this?

2006-12-16 11:08:46 · 15 answers · asked by Legend Gates Shotokan Karate 7

Recently the Death Penalty in CA and Florida was halted because a judge made a decision that it was inhumane. This was made because there was a Death penalty convict who was given lethal injection and it took 35 minutes for him to die because the poison was given through his veins and into his flesh. Your thoughts? I'm curious.

2006-12-16 11:03:49 · 26 answers · asked by ~~~Tara~~~ 1

As he was standing over my desk, he said "I am your ******* supervisor and when I say get me four videos, you JUMP"

2006-12-16 11:03:08 · 10 answers · asked by theresa_Q 2