Does Religion and Politics really make a bad mix or not in your opinion?

Question

As a supposed Free Country, do you think that Religion should play a role in the governing of the laws of this country? With such a melting pot of Religions and Beleifs, is it justifiable to bring those views and vote or make legislation based on Religious influence or is it best left as the constitution states. The Governement is supposed to be seperate from Federal Govt vs the Church. I feel it is a politicians duty to vote and serve the feeling of the community or state they represent and not vote their own consious beyond their own personal vote we each get. Shouldnt politicians be made to vote the way the majority of their constituents want? After all they are there to serve the people not themselves. I think too many have agendas when instead they should not be influenced by their Faith or by their consious, but have to vote the way the Majority of the area the represent. That would be true Democracy. What are some of your thoughts on this?

Answer 1

My bumper sticker says it best:"Last time we mixed politics and religion, people got burned at the stake". 'nuf said.

Answer 2

Religion instills such great moral values. I know everyone has different beliefs, but the basics are nearly the same. If everyone would follow what they supposedly believe in, this world would be so much better. I agree with separation of Church and Govt, but I also believe that all can find a common ground. Politicians should absolutely vote in favor of the community that elected them. If they have a personal agenda they're trying to persue, they need to learn to separate that from the views of the people that elected them. Politics are far more complicated than what they need to be. Just stick to the basics/common decency, and everything else will work itself out. I'm pretty drunk, but that's what I believe.

Answer 3

You have made statements that aren't true. There is nothing that requires the government to be seperate from religion. The word "separate" or "separation" doesn't even appear in the Constitution. The Constitution only says that "Congress shall pass no law respecting an establishment of religion..."

And when you say politicians should vote however the community wants, well, we might as well just let the best looking chick be mayor or governor or whatever and take a poll on every issue.

Answer 4

When has there ever been a time in U.S. history when religious views about morality did not have any influence on the making of laws?

The Bible says "Thou shalt not bare false witness." In the U.S. we have laws against perjury, libel, slander, and fraud.

Do you notice the similarity? Do you think the similarity is purely coincidental?

Of course we DO have a federal gov't which is "separate" from any church. The Catholic church does not control either the federal gov't or that of any state. Neither does any protestant church. The Mormon church does not control the Utah state gov't.

Politicians should indeed vote their own conscience when they create legislation. That is, they are not merely poll-gathering machines who transmit the latest poll information into the votes in Congress and the state legislatures. If a politician holds views contrary to their own constituents, the politicians should vote the way he/she believes is right rather than in whatever way it takes to guarantee their own re-election.

But there is nothing inherently wrong --unconstitutional -- with a politician voting his/her conscience if that conscience has been "influced" by a religious belief. It is, of course, unconstitutional, for a politician to make laws requiring that everyone belong to his/her religion and attend their church. And they all know that. None of them are trying to do that. But they do make laws banning "sodomy" because they believe that "sodomy" was condemned by God as immoral. "Sodomy" is not a constitutional right (although the Supreme Court obviously disagrees with me about that).

Answer 5

Most people's religious beliefs are the foundation for their political positions.

There would be no America if there was no Christianity. Christianity is the foundation of our government.

This separation of church and state is a lie. It is not in the Constitution. The First Amendment clearly states the government cannot establish a national religion. Acknowledging it is a totally different story. Read the First Amendment sometime. Here it is:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Answer 6

enable's get rid of race from it, and sex, and any distinction we may have. you opt to target to pass the regulation to make it that way? To outlaw faith from politics? i understand, you aren't to any extent further announcing that, yet frankly, short of that, this is going to under no circumstances ensue. Nor ought to it. i have self belief in freedom of religion (i'm no longer non secular). If someone is non secular it really is completely contemptible to ask them to completely ignore about their non secular ideals interior of a few thing of their life, or maybe part of it. we do not have any precise to finish that. Such issues are solved by using voting, no longer fiat, no longer regulation. we pick, as a collection, by using a chilly revolution each 2 years, and we are the envy of the international because of it. At best, they are precise, and we are incorrect, and without them, we are doomed. At worst, Marx is ideal on one ingredient: (i'm a Democrat, I despise socialism): "faith is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the middle of a heartless international, and the soul of soulless circumstances. this is the opium of the persons." we are no longer a mature human beings. we've numerous technologies, yet we are a ways from human being as a species. We continuously oppress one yet another, and our identities not often amplify previous our own skins to comprise our brothers, sisters, or some thing higher than a kin. would you've self belief the standard guy to his own ethics on a international-huge foundation without faith as a yoke round his neck? i'd not. i'm grateful. It keeps guy moral and moral in a international that without the preparation of religion will be an exceptionally cruddy position to stay (a ways worse than it really is as we communicate). human beings do not evaluate that. they look to imagine that each human being will be sensible and enlightened. No, faith has each precise to affix politics as the different ingredient and for that i'm grateful. We nonetheless have a loose usa. it truly is part of the freedom, the picture of airing our grimy laundry for some thing of the international to work out and gawk at is using loose press. enable's keep it that way, lets?

Answer 7

In our government, no. They should not have any participation, but in other countries around the wrld the majority of them are based around a similar religion.

Answer 8

In the Bible when God brought the Israelites out of Egypt, He intended to be their King saying "I will take you as my own people, and I will be your God. Then you will know that I am the LORD your God, who brought you out from under the yoke of the Egyptians." Which He was for awhile, only appointing judges over them, who ruled by God's standard, The Law. They eventually asked God for a king over them so they could be like the other nations with an earthly king. But God was still to be their Lord, meaning one having power and authority over others. So being a Christian, I believe that God reigns. Church and state were meant to be the same thing.

Answer 9

politics used to be directly linked to religion but since they split wut is right for 1 is wrong 4 the other and by combining the 2 to make them stronger they actually will get weaker because of the past, present, and future conflicts between the 2

Answer 10

We are not a democracy, we are a democratic republic. Time for you to grow up.