Law & Ethics - December 2006

2006-12-21 08:59:18 · 7 answers · asked by sweetestsin2145 1

2006-12-21 08:49:47 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm of the opinion that gun control tends to stymie gun ownership by law abiding citizens, but does little to prevent criminals from getting and/or using firearms. What do you think?

2006-12-21 08:42:00 · 12 answers · asked by cornholingmidgets2 2

2006-12-21 08:41:55 · 2 answers · asked by merrick_yellowrose2001 1

2006-12-21 08:35:48 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I know some of you might laugh at this but its not funny, my dad ain't the average type of dad. I just want to know what i can do, and no we do not get along if you were wondering.

2006-12-21 08:33:46 · 31 answers · asked by playaxn1 2

Answer yes or no and defend your answer.

2006-12-21 08:26:32 · 9 answers · asked by Nic 3

Like gambling, prostitution if it is legal means that more people know about prostitution as it is in the public eye so can result in more prostitution which is a bad thing.
Prostitution illegal underground can be a good thing and a bad thing. A good thing because people are ignorant of it so they can live life more happily because they can't do it as they don't know about it happening or where prostition takes place. However it can be a bad thing for other reasons. Prostitiuties can get help to an extent, but most of the time they can't Also not many people think of the clients of prositition. I don't know what you think, but clients don't seem be able to get help for addiction when prostitution is driven underground.

2006-12-21 08:16:53 · 15 answers · asked by jammy.greeny@talk21.com 1

Who is going to pay for the price? Also, what to do if the item was already sold by us to someone else already on Ebay?

2006-12-21 08:13:47 · 9 answers · asked by tan73h 2

Why so long?

Did you do it?
-No
Did you do it?
-NO
Did you do it?
-NO!
Did you do it?
-Yes
AAAAAAHHHH!!!! Got you!

Is that how it works?

2006-12-21 08:11:45 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

I Have a company that varely started and i need to let it be know www.sbcs.biz My strategy is to call small companies and offer my service and the benefits is that against the law?

2006-12-21 08:11:31 · 10 answers · asked by Wilfredo G 1

2006-12-21 08:10:05 · 8 answers · asked by scubs 2

I know someone who is a trainer at a gym. She is considering quitting and starting her own personal training service and using the customer list from the gym to contact the customers she has a relationship with to start her business. What do you think?

2006-12-21 08:01:18 · 12 answers · asked by Tavita 5

I was trying to work my way to management and actually I was training for management. Then, my manager asked me if I was on drugs because I was running around trying to clean our store. I had customers complain about me doing it because she said it in front of customers and now I have no shot at management. My grandmother, my mother, and my husband think I should sue for slander, because in all actuality I was not on any kind of drug. Does anyone have an opinion on this, I really don't know what to do.

2006-12-21 07:30:28 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

If you stole secret documents from the national archives in your socks how long would you be in jail for?

2006-12-21 07:18:36 · 7 answers · asked by Ransom 4

say you are coming home from work..school..ect,and you get attacked are you in the wrong place at the wrong time........thats what the police seem to say all the time,how can this be are you not allowed to go anywhere in case you are in the wrong place

2006-12-21 07:13:56 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-21 07:09:05 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

why do people think that they can come to our country and not learn our language? if i went to iraq you best believe i would have to learn to speak their language and now they want to come and take away our religions and our holidays.. i say f*ck that you want to celebrate your holiday then go home! I will look you in the face and proudly say MERRY CHRISTMAS! i dont want to go to an airport and see a big sign that says happy ramadan. what next are we going to be wearing smocks instead of hollister, robes instead of walmart... f**k that go home!

2006-12-21 06:53:58 · 10 answers · asked by southrnbell21 2

2006-12-21 06:49:22 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

I had to post this as a question Brain, but you’re wrong. On March 3, 1991 Saddam signed a U.N. mandated cease fire which suspended U.S. aggression in Iraq. He then went on two years later to violate it by ordering his intelligence services to kill Bush 41 in Kuwait City. A new war would have been legal then and there, and you do not need an additional resolution in order to enforce a previous resolution. Furthermore, Iraq fired anti air weapons almost on a daily basis at coalition pilots enforcing the no-fly zones; another violation of the U.N. resolution.

Second, there are four conditions under which a nation sacrifices it’s sovereignty to another nation or the international community as a collective whole:
1.Continued aggression against neighboring states and violation of their territories.
2.Violating the non-proliferation treaty.
3.Harboring wanted terrorists.
4.Genocide.

Saddam’s Iraq met all four of these conditions and demonstrated his ability and willingness to continue to meet them. You mentioned that I was right about us finding that Saddam’s chemists either lied or told the truth about their own WMD program, guess what; we couldn’t have known that had we not invaded.

Finally, Saddam’s continued rule in that country led to it’s internal destruction, they were using copiers to make currency, Saddam’s divide and rule policy led to terrible confessional hatred, and his crime family was allowed to maintain control of a county most aptly described as a concentration camp above ground and a mass grave underneath it. It would not have remained an un invaded country for long; Iran, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia would have invaded to take control of their clerical proxies and oil, so I don’t know how you make the claim that American intervention was immoral. Thanks for the discussion, and have a happy holiday.

2006-12-21 06:45:51 · 2 answers · asked by billy d 5

it's about system analyst in Information system study.And after using feasibility phase i know that to computerized the system will not cost justified.so how?

2006-12-21 06:37:18 · 3 answers · asked by shirley x 1

Our shifts consist of 7.5 to 9.5 hour shifts each..does anyone have any problems or conflicts and how are they approached for solving?

2006-12-21 06:28:23 · 4 answers · asked by basport_2000 5

I am worried about letting my son see his father. We had been together on and off for 3 years (my son is almost 2). We recently split up, he insists on keeping my son after not seeing him for awhile. I'm afraid he won't bring him back to me when I ask him to. He's threatening to go to court over custody. I'm not saying he can't see our son, I just don't trust him. What can I do if he doesn't return him, call the cops? We have no custody established (yet). I found this on PA law- "If the parents are unmarried, the child is the child of his/her mother. In order for the father to assert rights to the child (including rights to custody or visitation), paternity must be admitted or established in court." Does anything help me NOW before there is any custody established?

2006-12-21 06:26:06 · 10 answers · asked by MILF20 1

an englishman murders an egyptian on an american plane flying from paris to tokyo whilst in international airspace. in which country would the trial be held?

2006-12-21 06:04:20 · 11 answers · asked by Martin K 2

Is it leagal for someone to close all means of access to a buisness

2006-12-21 05:52:06 · 3 answers · asked by Jiggs 1

Who thinks that it is okay to be monitored at work?

2006-12-21 05:51:23 · 6 answers · asked by sbillips080904 1

...they would have still written the second amendment the same way? "Arms" is so vague. Someone could *theoretically* argue that private civilians should have the right to bear nuclear warheads under this terminology but common sense dictates that this should probably be restricted. What do you believe the founding fathers had in mind when they wrote "arms"? Do you believe they left it intentionally vague hoping and/or expecting modern government to interpret the law for today's needs? I am neither advocating for or protesting the second amendment; I just find it a very interesting topic so I hope everyone that answers will be respectful towards me as well as one another.

2006-12-21 05:50:24 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Please accept with no obligation, implied or implicit,
my best wishes for an environmentally conscious,
socially responsible, low stress, non-addictive,
gender neutral celebration of the winter solstice
holiday, practiced with the most enjoyable traditions
of religious persuasion or secular practices of your
choice with respect for the religious/secular
persuasions and/or traditions of others, or their
choice not to practice religious or secular traditions
at all.

I also wish you a fiscally successful, personally
fulfilling and medically uncomplicated recognition of
the onset of the generally accepted calendar year
2007, but not without due respect for the calendars of
choice of other cultures whose contributions to
society have helped make our country great (not to
imply that Great Britain is necessarily greater than
any other country) and without regard to the race,
creed, colour, age, physical ability, religious faith
or sexual preference of the wishee.

2006-12-21 05:45:04 · 19 answers · asked by Robert W 5

On a scale of one to 10, what is your value and why?

What about you makes you more or less valuable than another human being?

Serious replies only, please. For the sake of this debate, let's limit the interpretation for Human Beings, to those who are already born and exist in a society.
(I don't want to turn this into an abortion debate, please stay on topic. If YOU must make a statement of your beliefs, do that, but for the sake of the debate, go onto actually answer the question within the guidelines.)

2006-12-21 05:42:25 · 15 answers · asked by vicarious_notion 3

I bought a diamond ring for alot of money and when it was made 3 July 2006 the guy said take it home and try it on...etc see if it fits you. it didnt yet the size is wrong because the ring was wide so its the sellers fault not mine etc...late november i took it back to be resized (was busy) and today was told that cant be resized because would damage the ring. ive also been told nothing they can do...im basically stuck with a ring i paid for over 5 thousand and nothing i can do about it. is this true? am in ireland? any advice would be greatly apreicated?

2006-12-21 05:33:40 · 3 answers · asked by tinkerbell 4