I am a paralegal student. I would like to find out a possible solution to a hypothetical.
Arturo owned a seven acre tract, Skyacre, which was adjacent to a similarly sized meadow, Greenacre, owned by Benno.
In an effort to protect his view of Greenacre and sight line of the horizon, Arturo, without benefit of counsel, drafted a document stating that as owner of Skyacre him and his heirs will refrain from building on the property so that the view will not be obstructed in consideration for the amt of $25k. Documents were sworn and recorded. It is presumed valid.
After a long and happy life, Benno died, leaving all of his estate, including Greenacre, to his daughter, Carmie.
A year later Carmie built a home on the unimproved meadow of Greenacre. Later that same year, Arturo died, leaving all of his estate, including Skyacre to his son, Dante.
Does Dante have any rights as against Carmie according to the law of your state? Discuss and explain.
Please inform me!
2006-12-01
05:54:06
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Truth
2