Before you ask why this is in this category, read the whole argument.
You wouldn't find a single scientific study that can prove that second hand smoke is bad for you, because it's impossible to empirically measure the amount of second hand smoke you can receive in your life while controlling for other factors like smog and pollution.
We do know that smoking (first hand smoke) is bad for you, and we also have a preponderance of OBSERVATIONAL data and CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence that leads researchers to the conclusion (or hypothesis) that second hand smoke is bad. But in truth, we have no actual, real, PROOF of it, and we never will.
So if there is no scientific proof, why believe it?
*cough, cough*
2007-12-10
01:36:16
·
25 answers
·
asked by
Last Ent Wife (RCIA)
7