This is a good question and the typical answer does not address the question. The question is about God and what we usually hear is an answer about humans: people have free will and God does not interfere with it. No matter how true this is, it shifts the emphasis of the question and avoids dealing with the felt divorce between our conceptions of God and our life experience.
The question must be analyzed before it can be answered. Who, or what, is God? If one conceives of God as a being whose nature is to intervene in the affairs of humans, stemming from a literal interpretation of Christian Myth, then we must wrestle with these questions when reality challenges our theories. However, to shift the question’s focus from God to humans is dishonest and weak. Rather than say God intervenes, when God obviously doesn’t, or saying there is no God, why can’t we simply avoid the extremes and admit that our ideas about God’s nature are incorrect?
2007-04-22
02:56:53
·
21 answers
·
asked by
?
4