Law & Ethics - March 2007

I just wonder if this is ok or if this is breaking copyright laws

2007-03-24 13:56:35 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

Let me begin by saying that I offer my sympathy to John Edwards for his wifes condition.I pray she goes into remission.However,I feel he is using his wifes condition to further his ambitions.He is hoping for the sympathy vote and I feel that is lower than low!!!! What do you think??? All opinions please.I am a conservative and I promise I will not report any libs even though you do not show me the same courtesy!!!

2007-03-24 13:54:53 · 15 answers · asked by Mr Bellows 5

2007-03-24 13:48:29 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-24 13:46:03 · 5 answers · asked by tammy h 1

im 17 and live in pennsylvania. will i go to juvy for this? be fined? probation? what will happen to me?

2007-03-24 13:36:27 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Thereis a good reward offered but if I turn him in who will fight the infiddels ? And what will I make the kebabs from ?

2007-03-24 13:26:17 · 23 answers · asked by Aziz 2 1

I work in a school as a security person. I am a city employee. There is a gym teacher that haved been invading my duties and I complained to principal and my supervisor during a meeting. After that... the gym teacher has been spreading among the rest of the staff members that i need to go to anger management and also to substitute people. I feel this is hurting me that is why I just ignore everyone except for business purposes. Should I
talk to the principal and my supervisor again and say that I have intentions to sue that individual for difamation or can I sue the organization for which he works also because since my last meeting... Things just gotten more worse and he is just talking to much to the point where everyone is just indiferent.

2007-03-24 13:19:29 · 21 answers · asked by nachichu 1

I live in texas.

2007-03-24 13:18:29 · 8 answers · asked by RN 1

Numerous laws were changed and new ones created that infringe or appear to infringe on civil rights after 9/11. These actions have angered a lot of people as well as increase skeptism and resentment of the Federal Government. Doesn't this complicate the work of law enforcement working to promote national security and ultimately create a security lapse?

2007-03-24 13:17:20 · 3 answers · asked by Yahoo Sucks 5

Well basically I asked this question because I would want to get different views of the situation I’m about to give.

here we go, a man (no given name) owned a corner shop which is an old building and he does not want to lose business by closing the shop for repair, so when a hole appeared in the floor, he placed a board across it and to his employees to be careful.

However, one day a customer came into the shop to make a purchase and as she walked in the shop the board slipped and she fell down the hole and broke her leg. (Oh dear!)

In relation to the information provided, do you think that the customer (the lady that fell and broke her leg) has any legal right? If so, could you plz state. Give it a try, as I’m sure most of the people on here have a lost of experience, general knowledge or potentially experts with things like this. ;)

2007-03-24 13:15:59 · 24 answers · asked by bad gal 3

i got a summons and need free legal aid dont know who to trust. could someone help me fast, thanks.

2007-03-24 12:54:29 · 6 answers · asked by kit kat 1

I have a lawyer who has represented me in four law suites filed over the last three years. The plaintiff has cost me over $50K defending myself. I have always won the court cases but can not recover any money because he declaired bankruptcy before starting these law suites. This person has now forged a documents (cut and pasted my signature) to start a new case. My lawyer asked for the original but he will not give them to us (because there is no original). He is asking the court to accept this copy as an original because "he says" he no longer has an original. In my state it is possable to use a copy of a contract as an original. He has lots of money (HIDDEN) so he and his family starts something new every time they loose a case. What can be done to stop him from filing another law suite against me? He is trying to break me financially. I would really appreciate your serious answer and help. Please Help if you can!

2007-03-24 12:51:27 · 6 answers · asked by Caesar 4

Laws are passed by the powerful and privileged to protect, serve and help the powerful and privileged. Anyone who does anything to the detriment of the powerful, privileged group will be dealt with by the justice system and sent to prison, or killed.

Laws are imposed through force on those considered weaker.

Why is it considered "bad" when the weak ones fight back through the only means they have: raw violence? Why is it good when the system created by the rich & powerful kills a man for opposing it, but it is bad when someone decides to fight back using raw violence?

Legality is nothing but a thin cover on "might is right." Terrorism is the name given by those who enjoy privilege to the attempts by the weaker groups to undermine their power.

2007-03-24 12:22:00 · 6 answers · asked by Marino Quispe-Condori 1

here's my intro: Medical malpractice is acclaimed to be one of the leading causes of death and injury in the U.S. to date. More people die from medical negligence than highway carwrecks. Should doctors get away with causing possible permanent damage to a patient and receive a mere "slap on the wrist" as punishment? Some sources claim doctors like to settle the lawsuit outside of the courtroom so that their names aren't tainted by the media with negative remarks that way they can continue business. Others claim it isn't negligence on the doctor's part but instead the patient's. using this can someone give me a better way of continuing my efforts in writing this paper?

2007-03-24 12:17:43 · 3 answers · asked by rai k 1

May someone please explain how the 'Supremacy Clause' [Article VI ] and the 'Marbury' Case gave power to Federal and State judges to 'Legislate from the bench'? anyone please help

2007-03-24 12:06:24 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

If a lawyer drafted contracts knowing that they contained false statements, can he be sued for the amount of money that he helped to scam?

2007-03-24 12:04:38 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

What of the Constitution that gives the executive branch the right to allow the president privacy with his staff? What part of it gives the Legislative branch the right to create laws for payment loans?

2007-03-24 11:59:08 · 5 answers · asked by mikiegirl04 2

2007-03-24 11:55:08 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

to ride in the back of a pick-up truck in Oregon?
How about in Nevada?

2007-03-24 11:55:05 · 5 answers · asked by 4given 1

2007-03-24 11:52:19 · 6 answers · asked by nitesh b 1

2007-03-24 11:45:17 · 13 answers · asked by blueyedbabe894 1

the sign will read:

"YOU CONTRIBUTE TO GLOBAL WARMING."

2007-03-24 11:44:29 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

for chrisakes they have the proof

2007-03-24 11:41:39 · 16 answers · asked by smoothopr_2 4

The person who committed the murder about four years ago has been found to be incompetent to stand trial for the second time in that span of time. There is no question of guilt. The latest entry in the criminal court calendar for this person is Filing Settlement Agreement. In another file at an earlier date (~15 days) it says this person was released from the jail to go to a mental hospital for the criminally insane.

2007-03-24 11:40:11 · 1 answers · asked by firstyearbabyboomer 4

It is amazing to receive a reply that evades the question.

Firstly, what congress specifically repealed grand jury indictment?

Secondly, many city, county, and state employees charged with crime are provided grand jury inductment for all manner of minor crimes. Therefore, it appears that the government is stating that all city, county, and state employees are covered by the 5th amendment but the average citizen is not, which equates to discrimination.

I find it odd that a major protect safeguard was abolished by the government and somehow you think thats okay?


I might add that possessing the power to charge crime by circumvention of the constitution permits local state prosecutors to extort pleas from citizens.

It would seem the grand jury was a check and balance. However the very entity that is the epitome of corruption, being the government, abolished your protective safeguard.

There is no way around it, the government subverted the constitution, period.

2007-03-24 11:37:41 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

isn that a problem for those who dont belive in the bible

2007-03-24 11:36:25 · 8 answers · asked by carey 1

2007-03-24 11:08:28 · 3 answers · asked by shmoo 1

2007-03-24 11:00:02 · 6 answers · asked by samm_22 1

2007-03-24 10:58:57 · 10 answers · asked by Flyinghorse 6

i havent paid my court costs in 8 months and I now finally have the money to do so, what trouble will i have with paying it, or not at all?

2007-03-24 10:45:58 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous