My sister in law has a son that her and her husband get to see only 1-2 hrs a day. The rest of the day, he is with a family member sitter. Their philosophy is its worth the sacrifice to provide a better life for their son, and I'm having trouble seeing her point of view.
My husband has a job that he loves and allows him to have plenty of family time. Im a stay at home mom. Our philosophy is: why have kids if you just have to pay someone else to raise them?
Money or Kids?
Sacrifice time with your kids for more money, or sacrifice some income for time with your kids? Can anyone tell me WHY exactly they would be willing to give up all but an hour or two a day with their children, just so they can be better off? We arent hard up, our daughter has everything she needs, and is very happy. I know if we can do it, that anyone can. So why dont they? My family was middle class when i was a kid, and I am GRATEFUL that my parents were there for me. Care to share another point of view?
2006-10-31
17:55:19
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous