Law & Ethics - January 2007

Can income support just look into his bank account without asking and if they can does it matter that his brother has given him cash for a birthday present ?

2007-01-12 08:46:11 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

They are sooo bloody annoying - as they are really advertising (a religion) loudly in public would I find myself in legal trouble if I was to cut the cable over with pliers as I walk by?
No longer sure this is a theoretical question - and is it legal for them to stand there and advertise using megaphones?

2007-01-12 08:38:30 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

We know what is wrong and how to fix it. Don't ever victimized again. The veil of secrecy has been lifted, your life may never be the same again.

2007-01-12 08:36:09 · 9 answers · asked by Breakthrough Natural Health Products 2

2007-01-12 08:31:44 · 4 answers · asked by Mike J 2

She put down $5,000 before we were married and now wants it back, however, after I filed for divorce (date of seperation) I was ordered out of the house and forced to pay mortgage and utilities for 6 months, well over her $5,000. All I'm asking for is half the money. Yes she did put it down before the marriage, but I paid everything after the date of seperation. Will I get my half of the money?

2007-01-12 08:21:45 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Speficically data involving surgical operations that went bad. If this specific data is not available, any data on the main question will be greatly appreciated.

2007-01-12 08:20:59 · 4 answers · asked by Aldo 5

2007-01-12 08:14:37 · 6 answers · asked by Thumbz Down 1

American Samoa is being exempted from the minimum wage increase.Making it the only U.S. territory not subject to federal minimum-wage laws. Nearly 75 percent of the island's work force is employeed by StarKist Tuna.The average wage for tuna workers in American Samoa is $3.60 an hour. Starkist Tuna is headquartered in San Francisco...Nancy Pelosi home town.The Democrats argued Americans can't raise a family on $5.15 an hour and the minimum wage must be raised to $7.25 an hour. Did a generous campaign contribution to one Mrs. Pelosi save a company hundreds of thousands in employee wages... Hm mm.. Where is the media on this one?

2007-01-12 08:10:58 · 11 answers · asked by bereal1 6

What two people do behind closed doors, is not the governments business.My uncle told me about this and a bunch of other people,but they never gave me answers on why,the certain state laws prohibit that.I'm just wondering if someone hear can help me with that answer.

2007-01-12 08:07:37 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

and even if you have, will you admit it on here...i will...i have a record for all kinds of stuff from my wayward 20's.....who am i to judge...just wondered???

2007-01-12 08:05:36 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

He has peeled off the 'Signed for label' which is to verify to the sender I received it. because he can't be bothered taking it back to the depot he's carefully peeled off the label and put it through my letterbox anyway.

This is 'mail tampering' at worst, and certainly fraudulant behavior as he will have had to fake a signature to take it off the tracking system.

Do I complain (this is the second time he's done it) and risk him losing his job...as the Royal Mail will start an investigation into an allegation this serious. (With evidence).

I know it was this kind of package as I know who sent it, and I have a tracking number - and he left the second part still on the back...

2007-01-12 08:01:31 · 8 answers · asked by creviazuk 6

My ex is out of the country. While he was home for X-mas he pushed me around and hit me. I pressed charges. The state is charging him with Class A misdemeanor assault. Will they bring him back home to face charges or will they wait until his job is finished in March? Thank you

2007-01-12 08:00:29 · 7 answers · asked by GirlNextDoor 2

A family member took our car and we don't want to report it stolen just yet, We want to give him a couple days to bring it back so he doesn't have a Felony on him or anything. We didn't know how the insurance would be handled if anything happened while in his possession. Any body had a similiar circumstance?

2007-01-12 07:55:29 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

the potentential for investment in a private medicine is enormouse

2007-01-12 07:48:29 · 19 answers · asked by ? 3

2007-01-12 07:40:48 · 18 answers · asked by tizzy 5

I am in search of a governmental tort lawyer in the St. Louis City, Missouri and near areas, or Illinois, if there is such an ethical representative out there without unethical ties to the "fraternity" of media/so-called gov. of/by/for the people. My Count 2 letter is "prima facie evidence" that my right to access public property which I supported financially for 39+ years was revoked 2x's for 1 mo. / 1yr., by frivolous claims: ambiguity, and hearsay (subterfuge, slander, and harassment). My rights are guaranteed the protection of the "Bill of Rights" Art. 1, Sec. 2 (MO Const.) and "Equal Rights Amendments 5 &14 to the United States Constitution which includes due process of law (RSMo Sec. 182.230) and equal protection of the laws. Also, the Pledge of Allegiance to the United States of America (flag of), and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God with LIBERTY & JUSTICE FOR ALL(YOU/ME/US). Please help me somebody!
WE are ALL in this together. GOD bless us all!

2007-01-12 07:39:42 · 2 answers · asked by vic c 1

isn't it amazing how rediculous these things are? if one does not write down the new born babies they do not exist? fine, then they can not commit any crimes at all, they can not own, steal, kill, since they do not exist, right? sounds like freedom!!!

2007-01-12 07:22:11 · 6 answers · asked by unknown u 3

First off, I am very well aware that this took place last summer so you MIGHT want to READ this before you point that out to me. All I am asking for is your opinion on this since Riverside pretty much followed suit after the mayor of Hazelton did the same thing earlier.

2007-01-12 07:20:34 · 6 answers · asked by iwannarevolt 4

can a child of 16, decide wether or not they go to school?

2007-01-12 07:20:14 · 12 answers · asked by donald k 1

does the creditor or debt collector has to file a new garnishment after if the employee was terminated from the employer

2007-01-12 07:18:44 · 3 answers · asked by kevindhicks 1

The main conspiracy points put forward are outlined below. (These points are in no particular order)

Conspiracy 1) The George W Bush administration conspired to either organize the attacks or, at the very least, allowed them to take place. The evidence for this, conspirators argue, comes in the form of a policy document - Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century (pdf, size: 852KB) (external link to newamericancentury.org) - which was written a year before 9/11. The report was authored by leading members of the Bush administration under the name of The Project for the New American Century (Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush were contributors to this report, according to UK Channel 4 documentary 'The 9/11 Conspiracies', broadcast 9/9/2004). The report says that it would only be possible to fully secure America's defenses in the world if there was a 'catastrophic' or 'catalyzing event', 'such as a Pearl Harbor'.

Michael Moore's movie Fahrenheit 911 argues that the Bush presidency used 911 to radically increase powers at home and to increase a climate of fear, so that it could wage wars which will increase America's influence in other areas - American business has much to gain from the reconstruction and oil in Iraq. In a meeting after 11th September, Bush was keen to find a connection with Iraq so that it could be attacked.

Counter: There is a report, and it does say these things (page 63), but does it mean that these people therefore engineered 9/11? This is seen as a smoking gun by many conspirators, and even for skeptics this is quite a strange report. The counter must be that the George W Bush administration would be absolute monsters to do it. After 9/11 they pretty much did react in the way set out in the report, which could be seen as an understandable reaction if they felt the country was under attack.

Iraq never had anything to do with 9/11.



Conspiracy 2) President George W Bush, or those in his Administration, stood down air defenses on September 11, 2001. According to the conspiracy argument, in the year before 9/11, commercial airlines went off-course 57 times and in each case they were given an airforce escort. Where were the airforce on 9/11? If there was such an order it would have had to come from at least Vice President level.

Counter: The 9/11 Commission looked into this and did not find evidence of a stand down order. Embarrassingly for the USA, however, this investigation revealed that the USA was particularly vulnerable on 9/11 to this type of attack. As part of the peace dividend, following the collapse of the Berlin Wall and Communism, savings were made to the airforce cover provided inside the USA. The emphasis was more on preventing an attack from abroad, not from inside the US itself. So, airforce cover had been shut down as a long term policy, rather than told to stand down specifically for these attacks. (Where does the assertion that, 57 times before 9/11, the airforce did provide cover come from?)

Conspiracy 3) The Pentagon attack. The Pentagon was not even hit by flight 77, but was hit by a missile under US orders. The impact crater in the Pentagon was only 18 feet wide, but it had just been hit by a Boeing 757 which has a wing span of 125 feet and a tail 40ft high! There was also little wreckage. The US (or Soviets, or UFO) must have bombed it with a missile, surely?

Counter: Many credible eyewitnesses saw a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon. Security camera footage (from which the still, above, is taken), which was used by those putting forward this conspiracy argument, missed flight 77 actually hitting the Pentagon, it just sees the explosion (it also doesn't show a missile hitting the Pentagon either by the way). The plane hit the building at some 500 miles an hour, the subsequent inferno burnt up the plane which explains why hardly any wreckage was found.

Evidence: To see the video (released under the Public Information Act 16th May 2006, click here (.wmv format)) to see all the frames from this video click here.

Conspiracy 4) The sudden collapse of the Twin Towers. Conspirators say that a steel framed high rise building has never collapsed before just because of fire. The collapse is consistent with a controlled demolition. Did US agents plant explosive charges to maximize the death toll?

Counter: The Twin Towers of the World Trade Center were designed in the 1960's to withstand either a hit from an airplane or fire, but this attack was both together. Leslie Robertson, Structural Engineer of the World Trade Center: "There is no evidence there was a bomb inside." The planes were filled with fuel and this set off a chain reaction in the buildings which caused the damage.

Conspiracy 4b) We have seen arguments that the following footage shows a controlled explosion (video: wmv rm). We just don't see it that way. A controlled demolition would have required an explosion from the bottom, all this video shows is the tower collapsing from above. It is said that you can hear a large bang (the commentator refers to it) but that could easily have come from the beginning of the collapse at the top of the structure.

Conspiracy 4c) We have also heard arguments that the top-down collapse of the mainly steel Twin Towers can be compared to a controlled explosion of a brick and mortar building, as seen in this example (wmv rm). Trouble is, the Twin Towers did not collapse like the second controlled demolition example in this video. In the controlled demolition example the explosive charge is set at the base of the structure (you can't see it explode because there are buildings in the way), the explosion then starts off a domino type effect and the entire structure collapses downwards. The Twin Towers collapsed from the top down, not bottom-up like in a controlled explosion.

Conspiracy 4d) We have also heard it alleged that the secret services have hushed up satellite images which apparently show a heat source at Ground Zero, after the collapse of the building. The conspiracy says that it was this (additional) heat source that enabled the Twin Towers to collapse in the way that they did. However, following the high heat required to destroy the towers from the aircraft filled with fuel, we would expect to see a heat image following the collapse of the building, and don't see that this proves there was an additional heat source put there to create the controlled demolition.

Conspiracy 5) Israeli agents knew of the 9/11 attacks in advance but did nothing to try to stop them, hoping it could be used to their advantage against the Arabs. A group of men in a van were seen apparently celebrating when they saw the Twin Towers being attacked. They were arrested by police. The police were suspicious. They found dual passports, $4000 cash in a sock. At least one of the men was Israeli secret service who refused to take a lie detector test for 10 weeks.

Counter: This opened up a conflict between Israel and the USA. The USA seemed to be unaware that Israel were spying on them. The men were not charged, apparently on the condition that Israel stops spying on the USA. There is no evidence that Israeli secret service had any information on 9/11 before it happened.

Conspiracy 6) Similar to Conspiracy 5) but the House of Saud were behind the 9/11 attacks in the hope that the USA would then take action against the growing fundamentalism which is particularly destabilizing for them in Saudi Arabia. Immediately after 9/11, charter flights crisscrossed the USA picking up high ranking Saudis including many bin laden family members to enable them to leave the country. Surely they were material witnesses who should at least have been questioned? This is alleged to be part of a cover up as there are close family/business ties between the Bush family and the House of Saud.

Conspiracy 7) Al Qaeda used the stock market to make money out of the 9/11 attacks. Suspicious short selling was observed in the airline companies involved in the attacks, which meant that someone somewhere profited when the price of the airlines involved in the attacks fell sharply when the stock exchange reopened.

Counter: The 9/11 Commission investigated all trades and found no links to Al Qaeda. There are millions of trades outstanding at any time in a market the size of Wall Street. It is unlikely that Al Qaeda would be able to do this without it being traced back to them as the market is highly regulated (highly auditable

2007-01-12 07:18:12 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have 2 Wireless Internet Video cameras. On Wednesday, I purchased a 4 litre Milk from the Canadian Tire gas station on 64th Ave. N.E. Calgary and I stuck a note stating that it belongs to Mark.
And it hasn't been opened by me.
On Thursday morning, I came and found out that someone had opened it.
I had talked to the landlady concerning this issue as she is the owner of this house.
The land lady said that there has to be some proof in order to catch the person.
Now, I am the main renter of this house and she gave me full authority of doing whatever there needs to be done.
I have a black shelf in the kitchen and I had put a camera facing the fridge to monitor the situation.The landlady thinks that this should catch the person. Is that Illegal?

2007-01-12 07:17:07 · 19 answers · asked by markusfarkus33 3

When some faces an arraingnment after serving 15 days ( no one would bail them out ) for felony battery ( 1 charge in Sept. that went for diversion 2nd dec 28 which reopened the 1st as a probation violation.) and the Da or States Attorney's office was not prepared (only filed criminal charges on the 8th and the *** da was not prepared "as it was someone eles case". The judge had to continue the case for 15 more days as a "pre trial hearing" thus giving the state time to enter a plea agreement to the defense. My question is, is it possible for the case to be dismissed? Is it poss. that the 2 sides can agree to something before the 1st? How can I access the PDefender as I can reach is secretary and I never receive as response by phone or email. Please help me as I do not know where eles I can turn for advise and answers.

2007-01-12 07:07:17 · 8 answers · asked by jetratkat 3

2007-01-12 07:07:09 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

If the declaration was rewritten then what should be included?

2007-01-12 07:06:52 · 3 answers · asked by Answerfinder1360 5

she lives in assisted living in florida and has a large estate.

2007-01-12 07:05:39 · 5 answers · asked by austin 1

My mother died and left a will and the lawyer's said my sister was left everything but yet my mother had other children indicated as heirs. How can this be when the will also states she is to divide all assets among her children. The probating of the will could it have been done incorrectly. I have filed affadavit at the court house and was I right to do so. My mother told us verbally before she died that her home was to be a homestead and my sister would be over the house but to share and keep it in the family. I would like to know what to do concerning this situation. Any help would be appreciated.

2007-01-12 07:03:06 · 5 answers · asked by JoJoBa 6

2007-01-12 06:55:38 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-12 06:45:56 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

He lied about it so much. The american people ate his lies.
"This [Hussein] is a person who can't stand America. This is a person who has had contacts with Al Qaeda."-New Mexico Oct 28.2002

"He's a threat to America and he's a threat to our friends. He's even more of a threat now that we've learned that he's anxious to have, once again, to develp a nuclear weapon. He's got connections with Al Quada." Oct 28 2002- Colorado

" This is a man who cannot stand what we stand for. He hates the fact, like Al Quada does, that we love freedom. See, they can't stand that. This is a guy who has had connections with these shadowy terrorist networks." Oct. 31 South Dakota

"That's the nature of this man. We know he's got ties with Al Quada. Tampa, Florida,November 2002
There are a total of ten quotes in this Micheal Moore Book. About How Bush kept repeating these statements over and over again- until a few months of this propaghanda was flowing all over Usa- people wanted to increase troopsinIraq.

2007-01-12 06:29:01 · 13 answers · asked by rap3io4 1