isn't it amazing how rediculous these things are? if one does not write down the new born babies they do not exist? fine, then they can not commit any crimes at all, they can not own, steal, kill, since they do not exist, right? sounds like freedom!!!
2007-01-12 07:22:11 · 6 answers · asked by unknown u 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
to mae: i disagree. the world is designed to hold much more than 6,5 billion. that is if all the billions are vegan. consider they are not, it;s as if tghe population is about 100-150 billion. so yes, we are overpopulated.
2007-01-12 07:30:56 · update #1
to defenseon: i believe i am from here, my point is:
t h i n k: is there a reason why people have to write down who is born, get children to school, have them vaxinated, get them to college (for lobotomy) give them drugs, drinks, social security number, etc etc and a nice grave? what is the source of that? when did it start? do you believe it has to do with peacefull life of all of us? is it because the state cares for you or your new born? could it just be because they (we) want to know (to serve) the mechanism we (collectively) have built with which we are about to destroy the planet? ask your respective self, and do not feel obliged to answer the question. may i suggest to read a few books instead. i have suggestions if you like
2007-01-12 07:41:10 · update #2
to Peter: Is it a good example of yours? Somalia & Afghanistan, Iraq, &everywhere western "civilization" has interfered, made a mess and created a chaos, claiming they were about to "liberate", "free" , "establish democracy (?!?)" and other hazy -but politically correct stories. lawyers are just people that make laws. laws can not make people, no way...
2007-01-12 08:03:26 · update #3
not sure where your going with this.
2007-01-12 07:26:19 · answer #1 · answered by keri k 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your notion of freedom is naive and sort of ridiculous.
If a baby was not documented, even if it could not legally own or commit crimes, it could in fact do those things.
The undocumented baby could grow up and kill people.
Your "free" world is not much different except people would not be accountable in law.
You make the state of nature sound like some sort of utopia, when in fact it is vile, murderous and rapacious.
So carry on and gaze at your navel, or at the pie in the sky. In life, laws protect our rights and freedoms much more than they hamper them. If you disagree, then look at regions without enough lawyers. Areas like Somalia and Afghanistan.
2007-01-12 15:44:07 · answer #2 · answered by Peter 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you from here,like the planet earth or a sister planet do you perhpas do schedule 2 narcotics, I wish i could interpret what in the name of God you are saying but I cant even figure out what your point is, so canyou enlighten me, becuase my education and professional repuation would lose credibility by even answering this abstract obsecure senseless pyscho babble
2007-01-12 15:28:06 · answer #3 · answered by defenseonly 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A lot more freedom than that is to stop having so many babies.
The world is over populated. It was designed to hold 4 billion.
that means we need a lot less babies to even it out.
People should be limited to one child.
2007-01-12 15:27:24 · answer #4 · answered by Ruth 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree with you mae, people should only have enough children to replace themselves, in fact less for a while till we get it under control and stop raping the planet, otherwise we'll all die
2007-01-12 15:28:59 · answer #5 · answered by stephizzal 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think you are taking the "does not exist" a little to literal. they will put jane or john doe in jail if they commit crimes. just because you don;t have a name doesn't mena you are invisible
2007-01-12 15:27:17 · answer #6 · answered by Domino 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋