I'm trying to understand something. If the First Amendment to the Constitution says "...the Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...," with the phrase "make no law" being the operative element, unless that means the Congress is responsible, also as a matter of law, not simple inference, for creating laws to prevent such a respect, why is it the Congress, or even the Supreme Court's, business if religious displays is put on public land? I understand public discomfort, though I'm not sure how compelling that is on legal grounds, but if the Congress didn't make legislation compelling the displays, what exactly is the Constitutional violation in religious displays on public land? Where is it wit regards to government buildings?
2006-12-17
14:47:20
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous