English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

Generally speaking, malicious "news" or "rumors" doesn't really bear on the number of people it reaches before stating a cause of action for defamation. Have you suffered specific damages from the rumors? In most jurisdictions you must show the court that the defamation caused substantial harm (usually financial) and that the defendants were motivated by malice. There is also a variety if you are considered a "public figure" such as a famous celebrity or elected official, just to name a couple.
Moreover, are the rumors spread untrue? The common law maxim is that truth is an absolute defense to defamation actions.

It would be wise to consult an attorney in you area. Many don't charge for initial client consultations. If you bring him/her as much information the attorney can give you a pretty good idea if you have a case.

Hope this helps

2006-12-17 16:02:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Defamation under Sec. 499 Cap. 224, meant: "Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs, or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person, intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter excepted, to defame that person". Which meant can prove the action done, it's regardless how many people it reached.

2006-12-17 17:05:52 · answer #2 · answered by Tan D 7 · 0 0

ONE

2006-12-17 15:36:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers