I had a court hearing in the High Court of Australia, for a special leave hearing to appeal against the wrongful conviction which grieved me. I prepared my written speech for the hearing in the limited 20 minutes argument time. I was self represeted to criticise judicial bias leading the injustce, the errors of law and wrongful conviction in my written oral submission. However, the High Court used tricky tactics prevented me to read my written submission to the High Court putting my submission to the Court and the public fully. Then, unethically stopped me citing the doctrine of the precedent about what I wanted to say about the errors of law. Also the High Court in a attemt to stop me saying more criticism by failing to comply with rule of the High ourt using the double standard of law against me to deprive further 5 minutes argument time off me that I entitled. Finally, the High Court, substantially altered and concealed many key words relating these issues.
2006-12-18
19:55:20
·
4 answers
·
asked by
robert
1