think it should. As I understand it, it was closed without any arguments, testimony or anything. Such a major case that put meat on the bones of corporations and begun the process of granting them the rights of human beings, and allowing them to have only the ethic of money-making (thus making them psychopathic) and is a decision that I think is responsible for many of the problems in America today.
I'm not sure what the process for such a thing should be, but I think it should be heard with testimony regarding this decisions massive effects on the country, ethicists heard on the subject of the ramifications of granting human rights to corporations et. cetera...
2006-11-01
14:58:53
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous