We're doing debates and I need a few points on why the death penalty SHOULD be brought back into Canada. If you could, please list pros and cons. Thanks in advance!
2007-05-30 15:09:46 · 9 answers · asked by emily.f123 1 in Law Enforcement & Police
The best way to deal with this threat is to get totally out of the middle east and import no oil from there. Our money funds this Islamic Mafia. We only get 19% of our oil from there anyway, an easily made up amount, though a major cash bummer for the Oil Mafia. Any attack on the US or US interests would result in a total destruction of vast amounts of above ground infastructure in the Islamic state of our choosing. If its the 'wrong' country...hard cheese! As when Bill Clinton bombed the 'asprin' factory in Sudan. That little object lesson put the Sudan gov't on notice just how easy it is for Uncle Sam make his point. Worst case, we could destroy Mecca...that threat would certainly give these bums pause. Could we be that ruthless? Well folks, that's the question isn't it?
2007-05-30 15:08:17 · 11 answers · asked by Noah H 7 in Politics
http://news.yahoo.com/s/rasmussen/20070530/pl_rasmussen/immigrationbill20070530_1
"The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that just 16% of American voters believe illegal immigration will decline if the Senate bill is passed. Seventy-four percent (74%) disagree. That figure includes 41% who believe the Senate bill will actually lead to an increase in illegal immigration."
2007-05-30 15:03:56 · 16 answers · asked by DAR 7 in Immigration
2007-05-30 15:03:48 · 8 answers · asked by nabilah_ael 1 in Law & Ethics
Currently throughout the middle east, a women may be stoned to death after being raped upon charges of cheating on her husband. If they had changing the world on their minds, would they have wasted their time on Imas?
2007-05-30 14:58:01 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government
2007-05-30 14:57:21 · 4 answers · asked by That Guy 4 in Military
Why are poeple so into political parties like it's the Raiders verses the Broncos? You all really think that's constructive?
2007-05-30 14:55:34 · 24 answers · asked by America scarica 3 in Politics
and if so can they deny a person the right to be burried there?
2007-05-30 14:55:23 · 2 answers · asked by critter 1 in Law & Ethics
Why do Dems criticize Bush when he does the same as Clinton?
Interestingly, no Dem in Congress cares to shut the borders. Yet, Libs on YA will moan about the border being open. The Dems in Congress seem to totally disagree with YA Libs.
2007-05-30 14:51:58 · 6 answers · asked by duck 2 in Politics
No kidding - but nowhere does it implicated Illegal Aliens, because they want us to believe in Global Warming and not in the facts that a growing number of Illegals commit Murder, Rape, Incest, Aggravated Assault, Armed Robbery, Carjackings and enrollment in Jihad Terrorist Training. Yes a growing number of Illegals are joining the Jihad Movement against America. Now with this clear and present danger; How many Democrats do you know of that have died from Global Warming this Year? Oh by the way, last count of the Federal Prison population, placed Illegal Aliens at 29%. Ya we know, they come here for SEX.,
2007-05-30 14:51:48 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections
I really am wondering if so many people don't like him why did he win? But im just glad its ALOMOST time to get a new one.
2007-05-30 14:49:59 · 18 answers · asked by UNKNOWN! 1 in Politics
quoting ap wire...
The debate exodus began two months ago when John Edwards became the first candidate to announce that he would not attend the Sept. 23 debate in Detroit. A week later, Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record) announced they also would not participate.
quote 2
Democratic presidential candidates Bill Richardson and Chris Dodd will not participate in a Democratic debate co-sponsored by Fox News Channel this fall, joining their three top rivals in bypassing the event.
Given the ridiculous gameplaying and grandstanding regarding the iraq funding bill, especially after loading it with pork, 757 gate, the non taxpaying territorial vote grant in direct violation of the constitution and now this, perhaps we can show these manipulative "candidates" if they dont want to share policy with the voters based on "whining" about partisanship, we dont want to share votes and interest with them. Surely the us will be better off.
2007-05-30 14:46:55 · 3 answers · asked by koalatcomics 7 in Elections
Rather than waste another 50 billion and still have terrorists blow themselves up, why not use that money to create a police headquarters in Iraq, send half the troops home, and instead of us thinking we are waging war, do what actually needs to be done, police the country.
Police don't wage war on criminals, they police the area in case they see suspicious activity.
2007-05-30 14:43:57 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military
Who do you suppose these emergency internment facilities, contracted to Haliburton, are for? Has anyone seen these? See article on michaelsavage.com written by Jerome Corsi of world net daily. Oh, also check out what those peace loving islamists did to our soldiers on that site.
2007-05-30 14:41:37 · 5 answers · asked by America scarica 3 in Military
To me, personally, these are two different issues. One can indeed support our troops, while not supporting this current war. What do you think?
2007-05-30 14:41:12 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military
2007-05-30 14:39:07 · 6 answers · asked by Judas. S. Burroughs. 3 in Elections
I mean there are 12-15 million illegal immigrants about to be given amenesty.
Should we futher give them a big "Welcome to your new country" gift by flattering them by learning thier native tongue
2007-05-30 14:38:57 · 46 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration
2007-05-30 14:38:31 · 10 answers · asked by Pookie 1 in Military
Pros and con?Do you support it?Why or why not?
2007-05-30 14:38:03 · 1 answers · asked by drokk 2 in Government
2007-05-30 14:29:50 · 13 answers · asked by socmum16 ♪ 5 in Military
2007-05-30 14:28:39 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military
2007-05-30 14:27:44 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military
He told her they cannot not do a DITY move or get reimbursed becasue they weren't married when he got stationed there. They just got married this week and his superiors will not let him off to get her an ID or sign up for onpost housing and other benefits that he should get because they are married. She is staying at a friends house there but needs to come back here to get her things and find a place to live down there. She is only 18 and it is hard to convince her how costly this will be. She has almost exausted all her savings to go down there and marry him and he only gets a small check this week. Hardly enough to get an apartment. I know they are young and foolish for doing what they have done but what's done is done and I hate to see her come home and depend on mom for gosh knows how long becasue this guy if feeding a line of you know what.
Is it true that the ARmy will not allow him to move his wife to be with him jsut becasue they weren't married when he was starioned .
2007-05-30 14:22:55 · 6 answers · asked by JENNLUPE 4 in Military
2007-05-30 14:21:45 · 5 answers · asked by leo t 1 in Politics
Some inconsiderate prick stole my laundry basket and I just realized that they also stole two towels out of the dryer I was using.....what the hell? I hope I find the person who did it. It's not the money factor obviously, it's the fact that they think they can just go into someones laundry and take it.......ugh!!!
2007-05-30 14:20:19 · 11 answers · asked by New Year, New Me 3 in Law & Ethics
What is Palestine's take on Iranian assertiveness into the Middle East? What is their opinion on the formation of kurdistan? Thanks so much!
2007-05-30 14:20:12 · 1 answers · asked by Vivian H 1 in International Organizations
2007-05-30 14:14:08 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police
Nobody answered these questions I asked on the Navy OCS discussion forum, so I hope better luck here.
Just got pro-rec'd for SWO (my 3rd choice) even though I was hoping for IW (1st choice) or Supply (2nd choice). Now waiting for finselect.
I hear they move you around all the work departments of SWO. Will a time come when you can settle in a certain department?
So I'm guessing auxiliary ships are the most similar work to Supply a SWO can do? Will it give you the most helpful chances if you want to lat transfer to Supply? How competitive is it to be assigned to auxiliary ships once you're SWO?
So if supposedly after being SWO for a couple years and your heart tells you to switch communities, would not taking these OOD and/or EOOW tests prevent it? Of course, I know I would have to do a good job as SWO; common sense at any other jobs if you want to earn some more favorable and flexible work opportunities.
2007-05-30 14:14:00 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military
Many livejournal users have had their accounts deleted. Paid accounts because of on radical "activist" who is reporting users with certain words listed as their interests. People have paid for a service "months of service" and had their work deleted. Can anything be done?
2007-05-30 14:13:19 · 4 answers · asked by picturesdrewtook 2 in Law & Ethics
For years you have been asked if you would consider running for president to which you always said, NO. You and your husband's entire careers were built on lies. I feel that as a nation we deserve a leader who will represent our interests and not a liar who will misrepresent us. On your website you claim that you will be the cure many of the economic problems we face today. These are problems that were created and accelerated during the first Clinton administration. Think NAFTA.
I say these things with all due respect. I sincerely hope that whoever wins the 2008 election will be a people's president. Something we have not had for too long. Someone who will be able to do something positive for the people of this nation and not the interests of the World Trade Organization, multinational corporations and or special interest groups. You big shot politicians seem to have forgotton that government is servient. Being an elected official means being of service to the people.
2007-05-30 14:11:37 · 11 answers · asked by onesmartguy 2 in Politics
Questions asked on 30 May 2007:
Showing 151 to 180 of 655 questions
Questions asked on other days: