should we stop wasting tax dollars on marijuana prohabition?

Answer 1

Yeah. Lets put the money into teaching potheads how to spell.

Answer 2

i think of it is stable all of us have Bush to blame because seems to point to lots of that there is no project to sparkling up on account that Bush is now long gone and Obama's flair keeps to be intact. besides the incontrovertible fact that, had Barney Frank and Christopher Dodd no longer dropped the ball on their watch over the housing industry there could by no ability have been the ought to bailout something. See what I propose? we are able to all locate somebody to blame and as quickly as we will we brush off from accountability people who must be held to blame. that may no longer all that significant who's or replaced into to blame surprisingly whilst no longer something is achieved approximately it. the certainty keeps to be that it is Obama's project now and he's doing a awful activity of attempting the restore it.

Answer 3

yes! The government should actually legalize weed to help generate some more income. If they taxed it as much as they tax beer, cigarettes, and gasoline . . . think of the vacations they could take! In these times of so called "budget deficits" it would be an easy, painless way to help pay for some of the governments' reckless spending.

Answer 4

Prohibition is just a legislative action so it doesn't cost anything to have it on the books. What costs money is enforcement. It's a good idea to continue to spend some money on enforcement so law abiding people have a reason not to experiment too much.

Answer 5

Yes

Answer 6

LOL! (catspaw)!!
Yeah, I think the war on drugs has been a mistake all together. Not that I don't want my gov't doing something about it but it seems we are not really fighting it the way we should. And yea, let the weed go. My God, it is as American as Apple Pie with Beer.

Answer 7

Yes. I don't smoke it, but if they legalized alcohol they should legalize weed. If people want to fry their brains, let them.

We have many other more important things to do with the time and money spent throwing someone in jail for an ounce.

Answer 8

I think so. It's a sham that was passed by someone who wanted to impose penalties on targeted groups.

There were even racial smear campaigns in the past regarding making marijuana illegal. We no longer live in that time.

Answer 9

Yes, one thing that is never going to go away and is filling up the jail cells.
Ridiculous way of spending tax dollars......

Answer 10

Why are the people who think drug laws are wasteful and ineffective the same people who say laws banning guns would work like a charm?

Answer 11

atm, the laws in the several states do not require that all drivers in auto accidents be immediately tested for impairment. With widespread use of THC, that will need to change and we'll need the technology to make that possible.

legalizing without this technology or legal framework would add an unknown number of impaired drivers to the highways; would likely increase greatly the number of 'accidents', and thus would drive up the cost of all transportation [your auto insurance bill and your medical insurance for the accidents involving uninsured drivers without assets].

higher cost or more dangerous transportation means that every price in every store goes up. everyone misses more work and thus the cost of production to every business rises, which makes them raise prices even more.

We do not need to make America more inefficient and higher cost by legalizing mjane, despite that you arguably have a right to mess up your brain on your time as much as you like.

That 'right', like all rights, ends where it imposes costs on others. No one has any right to increase other folks' risk, or force costs onto them because s/he is high.


And yes, I think drunk drivers should be held to much higher standards -- choosing to drive while drunk is the equivalent of choosing to force risk, injury, damage, and perhaps death on innocent others. Attempted assault with intent to commit great bodily injury, or actual assault with intent, or even murder are not too severe for drunk drivers.