Politics & Government - 19 April 2007

That is a question schmorge posed in an answer to Sway regarding abortion. So, I would assume for those that believe this,,,,if your child were in an auto accident it would be okay to then murder them as well (who'd want to look at a disfigured child?) Should we send all the abortion doctors to Cambodia to kill the poor kids who've lost limbs to landmines? Tell me please, if we're killing kids because of physical or mental impairments in the womb (I'm not speaking of non-viable babies) why stop there?
(BTW-My answer to smorge would be, if the mother can not love her baby with six toes, she can give the baby up. You liberals should love that, since it may end up in foster care....which my tax dollars support. This is who should be receiving aid--not able bodied adults).

2007-04-19 04:31:58 · 14 answers · asked by Cherie 6 in Other - Politics & Government

I am trying to find a source regarding Kennedys bill that shows

That only 2 percent of illegal aliens are actually picking fruit and vegetables, but 41 percent are on welfare!
That 1 in 10 babies born in the U.S. are to illegal aliens.
That 60 percent of Housing and Urban Development funds go to illegal aliens.
That 13 Americans are killed each day by uninsured drunk driving illegals.

These are facts but I cannot find a single story in the news about them.

2007-04-19 04:31:48 · 3 answers · asked by rmagedon 6 in Politics

Are we loosing the war? Is a victory possible? Exactly what would "victory" be in Iraq?

2007-04-19 04:28:46 · 12 answers · asked by prestonwhitlow 1 in Military

2007-04-19 04:28:30 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

And does nothing about it? What is the process from there?

2007-04-19 04:28:16 · 6 answers · asked by Scoop 2 in Law & Ethics

Al Gore had a great military career but didn't even mention it. If he did I think the public would have been more outraged at the theft of votes and the Electoral College would have thought twice before making their decision.

2007-04-19 04:27:36 · 9 answers · asked by Rothwyn 4 in Elections

2007-04-19 04:27:29 · 9 answers · asked by mexican0k 2 in Immigration

Why do those of you calling for Gonzales' head refuse to acknowledge that the firings were LEGAL and LEGIT to begin with?
Do you not understand that neither he nor the Pres owe you an explanation for these actions?
Why will you not answer the burning question: why was there not a big stink when Clinton fired 80+ attorneys during his administration?
Last but certainly not least, why is this something that, as a taxpayer, you are willing to spend YOUR money investigating?

2007-04-19 04:20:50 · 10 answers · asked by Maudie 6 in Politics

2007-04-19 04:20:46 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

OK, I don't, and my wife doesn't, but some people think women should have the right to kill their unborn children. So go ahead and think that way, it is your right.

But why call it a "medical procedure"? Are you too afraid to call it what it is? I mean, it IS killing your unborn child, is it not? I mean, maybe we can get rid of the word "killing", and say we are "putting it down" to make it sound a LITTLE better, but why not call it for what it is?

After all, no one is saying the Virginia Tech shooter performed 32 "medical procedures", are they? After all, it is his body, he should do what he wants with it, correct?

2007-04-19 04:20:45 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Does it have any bearing on anything? What about McVeigh, Kazinski, Oswald, James Earl Ray?

Are these statements the ranting of the slow-witted and small-minded in a misguided attempt to berate people that don't think (?) as they do?

2007-04-19 04:17:50 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-04-19 04:17:39 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

My husband got home from Iraq Dec. 3rd. We were relocated and he's scheduled to go back in 3 weeks. This will mean he'll only be home with me and our children 7 out of 34 mos. This is very excessive and the commanders he's working with aren't seeing it that way. Does anyone know what I can do or have you experienced this? Thanks for any info or suggestions!

2007-04-19 04:17:08 · 8 answers · asked by jk2ambmw 2 in Military

2007-04-19 04:16:17 · 18 answers · asked by Y 2 in Politics

2007-04-19 04:14:47 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

Do you really think less people at Va Tech would have been killed if handguns were illegal or the amount of ammo a clip can hold is limited to 10 shots? drugs are illegal, yet easy to get. If you want to kill a lot of people, and your clips only hold 10 shots, do you really think it would help. I know most of you pansy's have never fired a gun before, but it takes less then 2 seconds to change a clip. 10 clips with 10 shots, or 5 with 20 yields the same results. Do you really believe in your naive hearts that limited access to guns would do anything other then create a very very lucrative black market for criminals to make a boat load of money in?

2007-04-19 04:13:53 · 13 answers · asked by bushisamoron1212 1 in Politics

Most are to docile & gutless to act in this manner! Few would actually admit to thinking about it! Some do get pushed to the breaking point & go on the rampage. Look how The American society threats is poor,elderly,fat & ugly,dumb & lazy, the homeless,the disabled etc etc.

2007-04-19 04:10:31 · 6 answers · asked by bulabate 6 in Other - Politics & Government

2007-04-19 04:10:12 · 4 answers · asked by zpiggy24 1 in Law & Ethics

I was watching Band of Brothers the other day and wondered how and why certain soldiers were assigned certain guns, such as the Carbrine or M1 or Thompson?

2007-04-19 04:09:48 · 11 answers · asked by cadsaz 4 in Military

criminal goes on a killing spree?

Where are the real heroes like volunteer firefighter Bob Seger who would just walk up and shut off the valve to a leaking propane tank?

2007-04-19 04:08:25 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

Is it possible for a person to get a restraining order against me, if I am giving an answer to every question they post?

2007-04-19 04:08:06 · 5 answers · asked by ive_bive 4 in Law & Ethics

The suicidal maniac from Korea who killed all of those poor innocents at Virginia Tech was taking anti-depressants. That made me remember when Hillary Clinton advocated the testing of prozac on 2, 3, and 4 year olds. What is going to happen to all of those children that were given prozac? Now 3 in 10 chioldren are on that stimulant. Are we going to have a country full of senseless maniac killers like Cho? Who will rescue us from the lunacy of Hillary?

2007-04-19 04:05:54 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

What's next, 3 month non stop coverage of Paris Hilton without underwear?

2007-04-19 04:05:50 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Especially when he is in charge of the highest office in the country for ethics, truth, and justice.

2007-04-19 04:03:14 · 6 answers · asked by San jap 2 in Law & Ethics

Shades of Katrina.

2007-04-19 04:01:50 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

Is there a point when coverage becomes obsessed and hurtful rather the helpful?

2007-04-19 03:59:17 · 25 answers · asked by Mother 6 in Politics

OK, I have heard many Liberals advocating gun control. Now we all know that the 2nd Amendment calls for ownership of guns, the debate is whether or not it is for PERSONAL ownership or ownership for a state militia.
But either way, it’s a tricky situation. If we try to ban guns, it’s kinda like “We MAY be treading on their second Amendment rights, but we may not be”

But, I can understand where you are coming from. The idea is, the rights given to us by the second Amendment are not worth our safety. In other words, we may or may not be taking away rights, but our world will be safer, so it is OK. ( I may not agree with that, but I understand where you are coming from)

So, if we somewhat fudge our right to bear arms in the interest of Public Safety, can’t we fudge another right, in the same interest? If we are going to keep criminals from owning guns to protect us, can’t we also silence organizations like NAMBLA to protect our children?

I mean, you guys say that guns benefit nothing to our society, and I’ll go along with that (even though I don’t agree). But isn’t it just as obvious; in fact, more so, that NAMBLA contributes even less?

Our nation IS a haven for criminals, and that’s sad. But it is also a haven for sex offenders, who often get out of jail on parole in only a fraction of their sentence. So, if we make this country safer for gun victims, why not make it safer for sex offender victims, also?

2007-04-19 03:54:37 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

Cho, the medics, crazyness, the teachers, Mercedes, wealthness, poverty, guns, the moon or

2007-04-19 03:51:46 · 16 answers · asked by smathemack 3 in Law & Ethics

Is your opinion affected by your beliefs, gender, age or any other factors? If you can, please explain how. Please also state your age. This is for a survey for a school project so please help me if you can... ;-) Thank-you!!!

2007-04-19 03:45:46 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2007-04-19 03:45:38 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government