Do you really think less people at Va Tech would have been killed if handguns were illegal or the amount of ammo a clip can hold is limited to 10 shots? drugs are illegal, yet easy to get. If you want to kill a lot of people, and your clips only hold 10 shots, do you really think it would help. I know most of you pansy's have never fired a gun before, but it takes less then 2 seconds to change a clip. 10 clips with 10 shots, or 5 with 20 yields the same results. Do you really believe in your naive hearts that limited access to guns would do anything other then create a very very lucrative black market for criminals to make a boat load of money in?
2007-04-19 04:13:53 · 13 answers · asked by bushisamoron1212 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Amen
2007-04-19 04:18:07 · answer #1 · answered by Tuefelhunden 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
For some strange reason, many people here on Y/A thinks that gun control = gun bans. This is not so. I would like to have a law in effect, that would have disallowed him from purchasing the gun in the FIRST place. Rather than have a "waiting" period where crazies can have time to further hatch their plots, why not a mental health certificate requirement. That way the LAW ABIDING, sane people are the only ones with access to these weapons. I realize that there is a black market for such things, but lets make it a lot harder for guys like Cho, than to just walk to the corner gunstore and buy a gun.
2007-04-19 04:27:31 · answer #2 · answered by Katie 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
DITTO; taking the weapons out of the palms of regulation abiding electorate will mean that throughout ordinary terms the criminal ingredient would have them. in the event that they could enable each American Citizen 21 years and up carry a pistol section ARM and Holstered for all to make certain, there does no longer be any prevalence consisting of this, and Crime could drop off next to no longer something; because of the fact if the guy had entered the college the place the final public carried a firearm, he could have been killed long formerly he ever have been given so a procedures as he did. hid carry is okay, yet to permit to maintain on the hip or on the shoulder is even extra beneficial, because of the fact a thief, Ganbanger, thug, rapist, or murderer could think of two times approximately committing the crime, and in the event that they have been stupid adequate to purpose it, nicely i'm particular that somebody who's wearing could positioned them down, and in case you shoot to kill, you wont ought to spend the tax money to throw their sorry butts in penal complex. A win-win for each individual, different than the criminal.
2016-12-10 06:14:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
for self defense you do not need more then 10 rounds in a gun.
i have a 7 round .45. that is all i need to defend myself. you do not need a 9mm carrying 15 bullets for protection. I am not a 'pansy' for beliving the only people that benefit from hi-cap magazines are criminals. (or law enforcement). why would you possibly need a 15 round gun.
that extra time that is used to change the magazine can be crucial.
2007-04-19 04:20:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Good point. Drugs are illegal and people who really want them can get them. If all hand guns are made illegal then there will be no paper work trail to link any murder to any murderer. Lets not fool ourselves there will continue to be gun violence after a no hand gun law was passed.
2007-04-19 04:23:48 · answer #5 · answered by Mother 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A limited or non existant gun marker just puts guns in the hands of the people that shouldn't have them. And then the good people are left helpless without.
2007-04-19 04:19:50 · answer #6 · answered by Jo 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Don't worry Bubba, The NRA is not going to let nobody take your guns away. Not as long as the arms industry can make money pandering to your macho racist insecurities.
And if Virginia will allow a mentally ill immigrant to buy two guns without question there is still hope for all of us.
2007-04-19 04:22:15 · answer #7 · answered by October 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
"A limited or non existant gun market just puts guns in the hands of the people that shouldn't have them."
True.
2007-04-19 05:25:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You're full of baloney. I live in a country with more gun control, and a lot less crime. You sound paranoid.
2007-04-19 14:46:47 · answer #9 · answered by Silhouette 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree.
A few good answers.. but of course a liberal just had to dive into name calling..I just don't see how exercising my rights makes me a 'racist' or 'redneck'..
I guess anyone exercising their other rights must obviously be mentally retarded eh?
2007-04-19 04:27:49 · answer #10 · answered by . 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋