Politics & Government - 13 April 2007

2007-04-13 05:06:08 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

I settled on a collection harassment case and the settlement amount is $6700. Of that money I will get $2000. Does that seem about right for them to keep about 70%?

2007-04-13 05:04:00 · 8 answers · asked by rebeccajo1115 1 in Law & Ethics

2007-04-13 05:03:45 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

How about a tattoo also? And an embedded chip? And a welded ankle bracelet? And a slave collar?

We're already required to show a Social Security card to get a job. All that other stuff would be just for show. The government already owns us, they don't need to rub it in.

"All men are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights"...unless they lose their paperwork - then they are non-persons.

2007-04-13 05:03:31 · 20 answers · asked by Ray Eston Smith Jr 6 in Other - Politics & Government

One for red states, one for blue states. They can work together like senators for foreign relations. Would it cause a massive migration to blue states?

2007-04-13 05:01:50 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

someone sent a very nasty e-mail to a person from my id, she has filed a police report and luckily i was in jail so it could not have been me, however they have also sent a very nasty e-mail to me and i need to find this very sick person

2007-04-13 05:01:28 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2007-04-13 04:59:42 · 15 answers · asked by killa d 2 in Elections

2007-04-13 04:58:05 · 3 answers · asked by crystal h 1 in Law & Ethics

Do you think he has a chance at becoming president, or even getting past the primaries? Do you want him to be president?
Besides the fact that he's a Mormon, what do you think of him?

I think he has a good balance of conservative and liberal views, and look at the way he handled the 2002 Winter Olympics! They didn't end up in the hole. I think he could handle the country well.

2007-04-13 04:57:29 · 17 answers · asked by red 3 in Elections

As a Mother of a US Officer & Ranger, it comes right to my mind that she is a media seeking nutcase thanks to all the special interest groups she has allowed to shape her thoughts & actions. She has camped out for weeks with media across from his home when his family was there. By now Elizabeth Edwards would have had her thrown in jail & the ket thrown away. She would be "afaid. very afraid". She is afraid of neighbors who lived there for years.

Sheehan says she wants an explanation - well, many about about it the right way & received condolences. The explanation is war stinks & soldiers die. If her son did not understand that, then the acorn does not fall far from the tree. Every soldier is told & knows the odds of deployment 98% & death .36% notice the point in front - less than 1/3 of 1 percent.
She wanted her son to be the exception to death & the president can't & shouldn't have to explain why he was not.

2007-04-13 04:55:04 · 20 answers · asked by Wolfpacker 6 in Military

The Founding Fathers said it themselves that the country is run by the citizens via vote.

Well American citizens want secure borders and immigration law enforcement to the fullest and it does not seem to be happening. Why is that?

Sure we got the ICE raids and law enforcement here and there but that does not seem to be enough.

2007-04-13 04:53:50 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

hitler had everyone rounded up and shot who he didn't need after he came to full power.The libs ,communists ,socialists,gave him the power to rise.We keep talking of deaths due to the war in iraq but what about WWII and the gulag where millions of people were butchered?Since Bush is trying to spread democracy through the middle east we now know why libs hate bush.As per the book i stated in my last question,the enemy of liberalism IS democracy...I contend that libs of today do not know who they follow.You should know this by the policies they make.i.e.abortion is granted to prevent the cost being covered by the state.High taxes....the state knows better what to do with your money.etc.etc.I ask you to read this informative book.All idiolagies use wedge issues to confuse the masses.Democrats are confused..The vote count that turned italy into a fascist state is as follows;libs,dems-310,radicals-73,refomists-27,catholics-29,repubs-17,socialists-52....read the facts ...

2007-04-13 04:52:02 · 10 answers · asked by killa d 2 in Other - Politics & Government

Isn't he a liberal?

2007-04-13 04:52:01 · 14 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics

John Corzine was on the way to mediate a meeting between Imus and the Rutger's women's basketball team when his SUV was struck by another and now he's in critical condition.

Had Imus never opened his intolerant Democrat mouth this never would have happened to Corzine, is Imus to blame?

2007-04-13 04:50:32 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Viacom owns CBS which employed Don Imus, they also own Comedy Central. Why is South Park allowed to be racist?

2007-04-13 04:46:16 · 33 answers · asked by DeuceRider 3 in Politics

2007-04-13 04:43:33 · 10 answers · asked by aworld_gonemad 1 in Politics

Imus insulted some women, has apologized, and is now getting canned for it.

Granted, an over-the-top insult. But scarring for life to the insulted? Probably not.


Now go to another part of the country, where charges against three Duke Lacrosse players have not only been dropped, but the players have been totally exonerated.

When the charges were brought forth, the school disbanded the Lacrosse team, fired the coach; deemed the players personna-non-grata.

Nifong, after mountains and mountains of contrary evidence, nonetheless continued his prosecution of the players for what can only be considered as political gain; putting the players and their families in a constant state of distress (and probably bankruptcy) for over a year.

Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton get on their fool pedestals and label the players racists, and besmirch their character.

Question: Who did more damage to whom? Was it Imus, whose one time over-the-top comment insulted a team of basketball players?

Or was it the faculty at Duke, Nifong, and the Society of the Professionally Offended (Jackson & Sharpton)?

Question 2: Where are the apologies; where are the consequences for the latter ship of fools?

Where are the rolling heads?

2007-04-13 04:39:42 · 17 answers · asked by Whootziedude 4 in Politics

The role of the Judiciary in the law making proces,consider benefits and disadvantages of making law in this way.also a discussion on judicial precedent and satutory interpretation..i feel my work in#s not sufficent

2007-04-13 04:39:40 · 3 answers · asked by Princess 1 in Law & Ethics

Are we (america) ready to have a black president? - Not personality, or educational background, or origin.... Are we as a nation ready for a black Mr. President?

2007-04-13 04:38:59 · 38 answers · asked by c 1 in Other - Politics & Government

2007-04-13 04:38:29 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

If Imus is going to be crucified, lets have it out. For some consistency.
How about BET.

2007-04-13 04:37:02 · 8 answers · asked by mmanO w 1 in Politics

2007-04-13 04:32:37 · 8 answers · asked by kevin f 1 in Law & Ethics

...said much worse and he is till on the air and more famous than ever before in his career. Also, if a black comentator had, said,"those cracker ho's", would he/she had been fired? My opinion is NO. Tell me what you think.

2007-04-13 04:32:09 · 22 answers · asked by The Salesman 2 in Law & Ethics

Sen. Leahy compares the messages about eight fired U.S. attorneys to the Nixon tapes. “Those e-mails are there. They just don’t want to produce them. It’s like the infamous 18-minute gap in the Nixon White House tapes.”
- Sen. Patrick Leahy, Vermont Democrat

2007-04-13 04:30:01 · 8 answers · asked by Feathery 6 in Other - Politics & Government

I seem to remember the names of the countries were carved into the wall but that the lettering was gold. I can't for the life of me figure out where I saw it so any help would be very gratefully received.

2007-04-13 04:26:20 · 1 answers · asked by Rob D 1 in Military

I thought the President was not suppose to make his decisions based on his religious beleifs. Apparently not if you read the following article:

By ANN SANNER, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 34 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - President Bush, at the national Catholic prayer breakfast, stressed his opposition to easing restrictions on federally funded embryonic stem cell research, a reference to a bill he's threatened to veto.

What penalty is there for a president who is not seperating himself from the church based on his religous beleifs? Next thing you know he will be giving the old anti-abortion speech at the Catholic luncheon.

2007-04-13 04:25:07 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

as per the"dictionary of modern political idiolagies"written by m.a.riff fascism was born after the 1848 french revolution.it came to dominance in nazi germany and mussolinis italy.the nazis tried to seek a partnership with consevatives but failed because the basis of being a conservative was to have the people bare the responsibility of the individual while fascism made the individual responsible for the advancement of the state.the jews were a large part of the conservative movement which played a part in their extermination by the nazis.Instead the nazis turned toward the middle and lower middle class which was the majority and gave the nazis their power.these classes were made up of communists,socialists and liberals.these people led to the deaths of 22 million people.Conservatism of today is defind as a movement that adheres to the U.S.constitution as it was rattified but allows for gradual change according to the environmentof the current era.so,who are the fascists?lmao

2007-04-13 04:24:35 · 11 answers · asked by killa d 2 in Politics

For those of you who think that the currently-reported missteps (misdeeds, if you like) of the Bush Administration are a big deal I say: Try, try real hard children, and remember back to the good ol' days of the Clinton Administration when REAL scandals were breaking regularly and we were treated to the truly amazing spectacle of Billy and Hillary lying their way through each of them and, excepting for Monica's dress, pretty much getting away with it, too. Earth to worriers and Bush-haters: The Bush Administration is made up of pikers - the real deal left office in January of 2000.

And now, of course, Hillary wants back in to the White House. I'd like to say to her: Make a convincing case for how the Rose Law Firm Billing records showed up in your living quarters and then, maybe, just maybe, you'll be able to justify the presently laughable idea that you should ever be allowed back into the White House without security guards observing your every move.

2007-04-13 04:23:44 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

2007-04-13 04:21:42 · 2 answers · asked by geesup 1 in Law & Ethics

Any form of sexual activity harms people who aren't married and permanently ruins their lives, so why aren't those that say otherwise thrown in prison for a long while and branded sex offenders since what they encourage leads to ruined lives and death?

2007-04-13 04:20:30 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics