One for red states, one for blue states. They can work together like senators for foreign relations. Would it cause a massive migration to blue states?
2007-04-13 05:01:50 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You would end up with twice as much monkey business going on.
2007-04-13 05:15:23 · answer #1 · answered by Perplexed Bob 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that would make things worse, now every thing would be 100% polarized, and all decisions would be a draw. three Presidents, who can only decide yeah or nea, no refusal to decide, would be better, two would always have to be for or against. then some work could get done. same with senators, all states have three, and the winning side caste the final decision. looks good on paper, but really no man made system works very well.
2007-04-13 05:11:06 · answer #2 · answered by edjdonnell 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO
I like President on demand much better. He stays on call in case he is needed.
Bush on demand would be tolerable He could stay in Crawford and cut weeds or drive his tractor. If Something happened that needed a president (like a State dinner with a Saudi Prince) then he could fly to Washington.
Go Team Bush Go
2007-04-13 05:10:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have two presidents. Bush and the guy who controls him Dick Cheney. Religion has divided us, under the canopy of money, honey. Looking forward to the end of 2008, when we can get back to normal again. Best wishes.
2007-04-13 05:07:14 · answer #4 · answered by tylernmi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure, then we would have 45 red states and maybe five blue states crammed with criminals, illegal immigrants, and everyone else on welfare.But then who would you tax to support them? I know you can have all the hollywood libs go there and then just tax them at 95% I am sure they would love the idea. Do it man, great idea!
2007-04-13 05:12:19 · answer #5 · answered by jim_2ooo 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We just had two presidents with the Clintons and look at what a freakin' disaster that was. The worst presidency in the history of the Country.
2007-04-13 05:07:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
That would be great. It'd run off a lot of the lefties. We can have two different tax structures too, that way you liberals can pay for all of your social programs yourself and we can cut our own taxes.
2007-04-13 05:07:34 · answer #7 · answered by Chris J 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of course not...
Why would there be any migration ?
They voted Republican, why would they change their
minds and suddenly become cowards ?
2007-04-13 05:05:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
isn't a single hemorrhoid enough?
Would sending Bush a case of "Preparation H" be considered an assassination attempt?
2007-04-13 05:06:09 · answer #9 · answered by Alan S 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Mmmm no
2007-04-13 05:05:14 · answer #10 · answered by mmanO w 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋