Any form of sexual activity harms people who aren't married and permanently ruins their lives, so why aren't those that say otherwise thrown in prison for a long while and branded sex offenders since what they encourage leads to ruined lives and death?
2007-04-13 04:20:30 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Also, why aren't those who offer so-called "protection" shut down and the employees thrown in jail for false advertising? Also for encouraging sexuality, which is something bad, to be used for something other than making children?
To do otherwise would undermine our abstinence education classes in school, right?
2007-04-13 04:25:52 · update #1
You live in Saudi Arabia, right?
2007-04-13 04:26:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
All of these things are you OPINION. Not one of them is based on any scientific or provable fact. "Sexuality is wrong" - says you. Quite a lot of people disagree with that opinion. "Sex before marriage leads to death" - how exactly? Do all these people who have tasted of this most forbidden fruit turn into raving psychopaths as soon as the post-coital cigarette is out?
There is a reason that we don't live by such outdated victorian morals any more - simply put because they're ridiculous. Putting people who have sex in gaol is going to mean there are significantly more people in prison than out of it - and they'll be having a FAR better time. If you want to live in a fascist state where everyone who looks at a member of the opposite sex is shot then by all means go and find one. I'm sure Saudi Arabia will accept you with open arms. As it is you are in the minority - so while I am forced to listen to your foolish opinion, doesn't stop me saying it's wrong and promptly ignoring you.
It is none of yours, nor the government's business what people get up to in the bedroom. Nobody is forcing you to have sex before marriage - and if you have a problem with people that do, then by all means cry about it. Doesn't mean anyone's going to listen.
2007-04-13 04:33:27 · answer #2 · answered by Mordent 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
it truly is often solid to revisit classes and their comments--i did no longer comprehend (if that's authentic) that the abstinance classes noted have been in simple terms on the middle college point and not at severe colleges. that's shown that a mix of abstinence with some further suggestions approximately warding off STDs and pregnancies does artwork, and we actually choose that for the duration of inner cities, the place in some factors ladies (in particular African-American) have a severe occurrence out of-out-wedlock toddlers. Abstinence does no longer get on the basis reason in the back of those pregnancies, so it is going to de facto no longer be as effectual as a mix application.
2016-12-16 04:43:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh honey, I'm sorry if you've had a bad experience, but there's no law against sex. You can have pre-marital sex safely and affectionately.
And why marry someone you are not sexually compatible with? That would make for a lifetime of missed opportunity there!
I'm not sure if they teach this in ultra-conservative sex ed, but there is more than 1 way to relate to your life partner. Or maybe they should only sell twin beds because sex is only for making babies and nothing else.
And also, abstinence-only sex ed has shown a rise in abortion rates, so I don't think you have the best argument.
2007-04-13 04:30:12 · answer #4 · answered by genmalia 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Several things,
1. This is a free country......I agree with preaching abstinance but that is not reality...
2. Sexuality is more than just making babies....it part of a healthy marriage and relationship with your spouse....
3. Are we going to start throwing the kids in jail who have sex before marriage.....if not, what is going to stop them...what good is thorwing the people who don't stop them in, when if they do nothing happens....is that what you next step would be?????
2007-04-13 04:31:27 · answer #5 · answered by yetti 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Worry about your own wee,bud.Stick it where and when you want to.Don't tell me what to do with mine,thank you.Sexual activity is healthy and should be separated from love,because people should be able to explore others without fear or guilt.Promoting?Since the sexual revolution,there is enough on tv and music to educate our kids without schools.Go ahead,find a big rock to hide them under and see what the real world does to your kids.If you believe sex harms people,you have deep problems.You should go masturbate and thank god you asked this question and I responded---you may yet be saved.
2007-04-13 04:38:01 · answer #6 · answered by doug s 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You have no idea what you are talking about. Sexual activites do not ruin peoples lives. The only way that it would is if someone used a condom or something wrong. Just stop talking and asking questions.
2007-04-13 04:30:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You obviously don't live in the United States and have a very limited view of the world and people in it. I am glad that I don't live in your utopia.
2007-04-13 04:51:57 · answer #8 · answered by bottleblondemama 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree 1 million%
2007-04-13 04:25:19 · answer #9 · answered by ~Celtic~Saltire~ 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Because abstinence doesn't work........
2007-04-13 04:34:16 · answer #10 · answered by Carpe diem 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋