Nonsense. Conservatism, as presented today, in no way resembles the core conservative values as the movement defined them in previous decades.
Less government intrusion, smaller government, less foreign entanglements, and fiscal responsibily were all hallmarks of what conservatives claim to be.
Intrusive state-police tactics, overbearing military, use of demogougery, scapegoating and fear mongering to take and hold power, and stripping of individual rights are the hallmarks of the current administration, and are more in keeping with facist tendencies.
If you support this adminstration and their actions, you neither support true conservatism, nor the Constitution. Just because you say you do, doesn't mean that's actuality. Actions speak louder than words, and if you claim to support the actions of the current administration, then the history supports those who label you, not the other way around.
2007-04-13 05:00:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Your rationale is specious. Conservatives come in more than one color. It WAS nationalist conservatives who favored Hitler's rise--especially in 1934 (when Hitler was elected Chancellor) and the Nazis arrested and executed socialists/communists in the 30's and 40's. To suggest that the Nazis were "liberal" is to turn history on its head (perhaps the concept of National Socialism confuses you). Moreover, Mussolini's Italy was largely supported by conservative industry owners. You have a poor grasp on the history of fascism.
That said, however, as a liberal, I rarely call anyone a fascist--some of my family was killed in World War II by REAL fascists.
And I have a question for you: why do conservatives label liberals socialists, communists, and/or traitors?
2007-04-13 04:34:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by blueevent47 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
How much History have you made? BTW, it is fact that Conservative Republicans in modern day do not want you to ever be wealthy, they want you to work for minimum wage all your life. They are happy you pay $2.89 per gal. of gas. They own stocks that are doing well in Exxon Mobile.The USA has a $9 trillion debt over ten years, the Iraq occupation will cost working class tax payers $2 trillion over ten years. All caused by Republicans. All done by Republicans in the last 6 years. I am very Happy I am not 30 years old paying taxes to pay for the Republicans lack of being Conservative.
BTW, Republicans were in the drivers seat when the Sept. 11th. attack on America was done also. They did nothing to prevent it. Read the Sept. 11th. report to Congress. Bush was told (PDB) in advance of that attack.
2007-04-13 04:51:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by jl_jack09 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nazism or Naziism, formally spoke of as nationwide Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus), refers in many cases to the totalitarian ideology and practices of the Nazi party (nationwide Socialist German workers' party, German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei or NSDAP) below Adolf Hitler. Fascism is an authoritarian political ideology (frequently tied to a mass flow) that considers individual and different societal hobbies no longer so good because of the fact the desires of the state, and seeks to forge a sort of nationwide team spirit, frequently in keeping with ethnic, non secular, cultural, or racial attributes. multiple scholars characteristic distinctive features to fascism, yet here aspects are frequently considered as its crucial aspects: nationalism, authoritarianism, militarism, corporatism, collectivism, totalitarianism, anti-communism, and opposition to financial and political liberalism The term fascismo become first coined by ability of the Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini. it rather is derived from the Italian be conscious fascio, meaning "union" What i'm poining out right this is that libs call different fascist because of the fact they what to shift the gentle of reality faraway from them.
2016-10-02 22:26:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perhaps you should start with a definition of liberals. Seems to me that the right has taken the most common definition and skewed it to conform to their misguided belief.
ADJECTIVE: 1a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded. c. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism.
2007-04-13 04:33:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by kenny J 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Thanks for this question! I argue all the time on here, about this very thing! I blame Wikipedia, for their revisionist definition of fascism (post WWII definition). When all fascist regimes occurred before WWII.
I blame public education.
2007-04-13 04:39:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
http://www.bushflash.com/14.html
Watch this.
Think about it for awhile.
Unsettling isn't it?
How can we let Fascism root in our society after all the sacrifice of our people in WWII?
Disgraceful!
2007-04-13 04:36:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It goes both ways. Kinda like yourself after some drinks..
2007-04-13 04:32:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Liberals love calling people names and words in which they don't know the meaning.
2007-04-13 04:28:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Yes, Liberals are fascist.
2007-04-13 04:29:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by nom de paix 4
·
3⤊
3⤋