Apparently in a lot of places overseas, players are more honest with their coaches. I think goaltenders are the best example to explain the difference between ideologies.
If a goalie from overseas isn't stopping more than half the shots on them early in the 1st period, and maybe has 3 goals scored against them already, they are more inclined to request that the coach put the backup in. They see that as being a team player.
Players from the North American continent are more inclined to want to stay in and battle through their rough nights. Only well into the game, say 3rd period when the score is 6-1 does the coach pull them and put the backup in. They see that (battling until it's nearly over) as being a team player.
Which philosophy do you prefer for a goaltender?
If a forward's having a bad game, should he tell the coach to sit him out of the important shifts (like a PP or PK) or let the coach put him out and battle through?
2007-08-24
14:08:59
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Erica
6
in
Hockey