If the definition of a terrorist attack is one that directly targets civilian non-combatants then why does the west have such double standards? For example, my lai massacre, northern ireland events, hiroshima, nagasaki, tokyo, dresden, london, rotterdam, king david hotel, etc, etc, etc.
Someone please explain to me how those are acts of war to be proud of but when a muslim does it to a westerner it is "Terrorism"?
The usual answer I get is, "Well we were nations at war, and they are guerilla organizations." If you feel that way, then please tell me how you can honestly believe it is OK for a nation to target and kill civilian non-combatants but it is NOT OK for an organization to do so.
2007-10-31
09:30:16
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Jesus Cake
3