Politics & Government - 18 December 2006

2006-12-18 09:37:22 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

Are they so comfortable promoting nasty, belittling stereotypes of Americans: they are fat and lazy, have "attitudes," are "complacent," only wish to watch mind-numbing television, and their country would come to a dead stop without hard-working immigrants, presumably because their fat- and tv-addled brains are incapable of the kind of innovation that only immigrants can provide them. It is a wonder that such people managed to somehow build a country that many people want to immigrate to.

I also find it fascinating that the same people protesting for "solidarity" seem to have no sense of solidarity with American workers, and simply accept their bosses viewpoint that American workers are "lazy" and have "attitudes" when they reject poorly paid employment, complain about dangerous working conditions, or seek to organize on their jobs. What say you ?

2006-12-18 09:35:02 · 22 answers · asked by Zoe 4 in Immigration

Are there any true U.S. Government Grant's for those with disabilities.If so are they hard to obtain.

2006-12-18 09:33:41 · 2 answers · asked by nick722 2 in Other - Politics & Government

I am looking to become a nurse, but I would like to know if you have to be in the Navy to work there.

2006-12-18 09:33:09 · 3 answers · asked by o0pirateaddict4life0o 1 in Military

What are the advantages and disadvantages of each

2006-12-18 09:31:47 · 4 answers · asked by Barrett R 2 in Government

I am from Canada, and currently live in Canada, I was wondering how do I become an American resident? what is the best and easiest way?

2006-12-18 09:31:23 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

why did they cite for a violation when i said only positive things about hillary clinton. do they hate hillary? are they gop agents in this org?

2006-12-18 09:29:01 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-12-18 09:28:17 · 29 answers · asked by EW 3 in Immigration

Should US invade it or sanctions would be enough?

2006-12-18 09:27:44 · 7 answers · asked by Ormoz 3 in Other - Politics & Government

My dad works full-time on salary and his pay day is on the 1st and 15th on the month. With the new year approaching, his boss has informed him that because banks, etc. will be closed January 1st, he will not be paid until January 2nd, 2007; is this legal in Ontario (Canada)?

I'm trying to locate documentation stating otherwise...

Thanks for your help.

Shannonkv

2006-12-18 09:27:04 · 7 answers · asked by shannonkv 2 in Law & Ethics

At this point in the illegal immigration debate, racist means someone who wants the laws enforced. So please call me racist. Do you have any other arguments pro-illegals?

2006-12-18 09:26:17 · 13 answers · asked by Help me 1 in Immigration

2006-12-18 09:25:27 · 1 answers · asked by greekmanuk81 2 in Government

You bet they do,why else this statistically wrong rubbish?:

Alex B.Ph.D.(who wanted his vote for John Kerry in 2004 to stay a secret between him and me:
"Liberal mindset:
Terrorism and muslim extremism, car bombs, beheadings, 9/11, this must be tolerated, otherwise muslims might be offended."


I thought Bush and the know-nothings had "liberating" Iraq in the bag? What gives?

2006-12-18 09:24:33 · 22 answers · asked by cannon Ball! 3 in Politics

One of the goals of Communism is to spead it throughout the world. We are doing the same thing in the Iraq though.

2006-12-18 09:21:01 · 9 answers · asked by greencoke 5 in Government

Alex B.Ph.D.(who wanted his vote for John Kerry in 2004 to stay a secret between him and me:
"Liberal mindset:
Terrorism and muslim extremism, car bombs, beheadings, 9/11, this must be tolerated, otherwise muslims might be offended."


Ha ha ha,NO,its not at all. What TYPICAL conformist "I'm too scared of conservative criticism to think for myself" rhetoric.
NAME ONE LIBERAL WHO TOLD YOU THAT BS.
NAME ONE


Liberal mindest for real:
Get rid of Bush's disasterous policies that have increased terrorism and lets have some accountability in Iraq for once.
Maybe we CAN create peace in the long run.Wont make money for liberal-bashing reactionaries,but so what?

Just like the voters voted for in November.

And Alex,that you for prooving that consrevative talk is chemically induced,just like the flower children in the 60s left counterpart.

2006-12-18 09:19:08 · 20 answers · asked by cannon Ball! 3 in Politics

From most seniority to least?

2006-12-18 09:16:57 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2006-12-18 09:14:21 · 13 answers · asked by Maggie 73 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

Why do we freely hand nuclear secrets to India while condemming the other nations for trying to uncover them? Why do we expand our own nuclear program while stiffeling the rest of the worlds efforts?

2006-12-18 09:13:38 · 16 answers · asked by dolphinparty13 2 in Politics

Americans are only interested in using the British land and its people.

2006-12-18 09:12:11 · 29 answers · asked by poolitics 1 in Other - Politics & Government

to the government and other agencies. I understand what this is for, and I know that some of this money goes to people on welfare, etc..what i dont care for is when some people decide to go climb a mountain in the dead of winter and my tax dollars are used to go look for them..im thinking hundreds of thousands have gone to help look for the remaining two mt hood mountain climbers...why? nobody forced them to do this..they were looking for adventure and they got it...why should i pay for their stupidity? you can agree or disagree with my comments i dont care..i dont think its right.

2006-12-18 09:11:15 · 19 answers · asked by INFINITE CONSCIOUSNESS 5 in Government

I just now received a answering machine message and he tells me my court date is in 7 days.

2006-12-18 09:08:06 · 7 answers · asked by Mark s 1 in Law & Ethics

I think so.

2006-12-18 09:07:56 · 13 answers · asked by Travis R 3 in Immigration

To me Segolene Royal the French presidential candidate if she wins the election would be the hottest president in History. Does anyone disgree or thinks they know someone who is hotter than her

2006-12-18 09:06:13 · 7 answers · asked by cokerso75287 2 in Government

What do you think of this idea? To stop the fighting you dangle a giant carrot in front of the fighters. If they continue fighting, they don't get the carrot. For example, you announce a $500 million grant over 10 years to scientists/people in the country requiring equal numbers of participants from all factions (as many as possible). If accepted, the money would help bring sides together for a common goal that would lead to development that would further prevent war and suffering. Sounds pretty cool, huh?

2006-12-18 09:03:34 · 4 answers · asked by xt_oo_tx 2 in Government

The reason that he gave us for going into war with Iraq was to stop Saddam from producing Weapons of Mass Destruction. However, he has come out and said that there were no WMD's. So he changed the purpose of the war to speading democracy. Do you still support him after this?

2006-12-18 09:02:10 · 16 answers · asked by greencoke 5 in Government

2006-12-18 09:00:32 · 7 answers · asked by Zubair U 1 in Government

Why do people decree "State Sovereignty" a reason for not deposing Saddam ??
The most ridiculous argument an activist or diplomat can make in defense of a dictator like Saddam Hussein is that the tyrant cannot be deposed because of his nation Sovereignty. The notion that America did not have the authority to overthrow one of the worst dictators (over 1,000,000 civilians killed during his reign ) that ever walked the face of the earth because of state sovereignty is absurd.

Based on that logic : Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, Kosovo, Bosnia, Rwanda, Sudan are unable to be touched because they too are sovereign nations.
The genocide in Rwanda, for example, has been mourned theatrically in retrospect – Europeans especially will weep over corpses, but will do nothing to protect those still alive. In America we call this cowardice!

The sole purpose for any government is to protect its citizens. A state that kills its own people has no legitimacy! NO MATTER WHAT THE TYRANNT RIDDEN UNITED NATIONS SAYS. Knowing what we all no now about the mass graves and torture chambers, WMD attacks, and countless other severe infractions of” international law”, how can any moral person state that Saddam should have been left alone?
Sovereignty cannot be an excuse for uninhibited savagery. Saddam was a HITLER to his people. People who objected to the removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime on grounds of state sovereignty are the moral descendents of those who looked away from Hitler’s crimes. The difference today is that those who condone mass murder pose as moral arbiters and demand to know what right America has to decide which governments are tolerable and which are not. The answer is simple. “When the forces for good fail to act, the forces of evil triumph.” And America is the worlds essential force for good. No amount of fashionable anti-Americanism will change that. And though we may not always have the blessing from the rest of the world to depose dictators, tyrants, murderers and terrorists we will surge forward and do what we know is right. The world will be better for it.

We must not fear to act when action is necessary, moral and possible. Whenever the situation allows we should act in concert with our natural allies and those apprentice states moving toward mature freedom. But when we are forced to stand alone in a just cause, we must not hesitate…Let history judge us.

2006-12-18 08:58:07 · 9 answers · asked by quarterback 2 in Politics

What are you required to do in bootcamp?

2006-12-18 08:56:29 · 2 answers · asked by o0pirateaddict4life0o 1 in Military

It was her first and only arrest and is a misdeminer not a fellony. She has done the classes ,public service work, and will soon be off probation

2006-12-18 08:56:11 · 5 answers · asked by roger m 1 in Law & Ethics

every thing about him smells of pure conservatism.

2006-12-18 08:55:54 · 7 answers · asked by poolitics 1 in Other - Politics & Government