Do you agree with Bush's Iraq policy?

Question

The reason that he gave us for going into war with Iraq was to stop Saddam from producing Weapons of Mass Destruction. However, he has come out and said that there were no WMD's. So he changed the purpose of the war to speading democracy. Do you still support him after this?

No there were no WMD's found, the Bush Administration admitted that.

And there were NO terrorist camps in Iraq before the war. There are now only because the border isn't/wasn't secured.

In response to the fact that something like 9/11 could happen because of Iraq, how?

With no WMD's I doubt they could do much.

yes, we may be killing terrorists now, but when Saddam was in power there were no terrorists

Answer 1

If some of you feel it is okay for the Americans to force their justice and beliefs on other countries don't complain when the US goes belly up and outside investors start running the United States.

Answer 2

First of all, Bush was given bad information from his advisors about the war in Iraq. Blame them, not him.

Second, Congress voted to go to war with Iraq.

Third, if we left after we didn't find and WMD's, the country would be in turmoil and turn their anger towards us.

You say you feel sorry for all the parents of the soldiers. Well, I do to. We should try to end this war as quickly as possible. But you know who i feel MORE sorry for? THe families of the victims of 9/11. If we leave Iraq now, it will happen all over again. Would you want to explain to THOSE parents why their children are dead?

At least you can tell the soldier's parents' "your son died defending our country." If we leave Iraq, and there is another terrorist attack, what will you tell those parents? "We didn't like the war, so we left. That is why your son is dead"

Right or wrong, we CANNOT leave Iraq until the country is stable.

Answer 3

WMD was only 1 of MANY reasons. It would be nice if people like you paid attention when the President spoke. He clearly stated that Iraq was one of the 3 members of the Axis of Evil. This is the primary reason we went in.

The results? Now we only have 2 members of the Axis of Evil (Iran and NK) that have or are close to WMD instead of 3. So yes, I support his policy. Sure there have been some mistakes, but there is in every war. The overall plan of getting rid of the Axis of Evil and changing the culture of the Middle East is good policy, if you care about American lives.

Answer 4

I do. Despite idiots who can't spell and know little, if any, grammar saying otherwise. Not to mention that they know nothing about what they're talking about 7/8ths of the time.

When we went over there, what we were doing was essentially giving them democracy. Frankly, they needed it. Even if there were no WMDs, at least we got Saddam out. That was the biggest problem. That is much better than going over there to spread democracy and get out Saddam, but ended up confiscating WMDs and leaving.

Well, at least Bush has one supporter.

Answer 5

There were WMD's and Saddam was a threat to the US so for those reasons I did and do support going to Iraq. I don't agree with the troop levels (too low) and timing of the Iraq war. IMO Bush, the senate and the house of reps. should have waited a little longer after Afghanistan began and they should have went in unannounced in order to prevent the hiding of the WMD's. I mention the House and Senate because it took them along with the pres to declare war. People seem to overlook the fact that the Iraq war was passed by majority vote.

Answer 6

Oh yeah I nonetheless save in options how this artwork we embargo the eastern because they are invading their associates in a quest for organic elements Japan did not have so then they declare conflict on us attack Pearl Harbor. bypass to regular era on the right of WW 2 there is not a lot team spirit between Arab international locations or human beings and considering the numerous international locations had sided with the NAZIs ( unusual how human beings favor to ignore that section) the allies truly Britain replaced some limitations and put in some rulers to attempt to stabilize this position. definite we had a hand in this also. Did we slaughter those adult males entire sale no that's some thing they're a lot more beneficial at than lets ever aspire to be? Yeah we've dabbled of their politics, is someone claiming they have stayed out of ours. And with the help of ways if it weren't for BP, favourite, Amoco and some others the position would those freakin camel jockeys be besides. usually nonetheless residing in tents and raiding one yet another for ladies human beings and elements. yet I do understand the question: in case you turn me off I kill you and all of us interior the motor vehicle with you no matter if that is a school buss finished of childrens. If I step on your toe on the mall you need to annihilate each man or woman interior the mall to redeem face and please ALLAH. In different words the Judaists can do some thing they favor to for any insult actual or imagined and WE (being those they are doing this insulting) ought to sit down idly with the help of or maybe help them with the help of exposing our safe practices to them interior the media so as that they could slaughter us somewhat less difficult. HEEELLLL NNNOOO i do not favor to strive against all of us yet in the experience that they insist then we ought to oblige. for decades even our maximum ineffective leaders have tried to have communicate with those human beings and maximum of them proceed to coach their little ones to homicide us entire sale.

Answer 7

Yes. The alternative is to leave the dirt to the Taliban and al Qaeda, with free license to hatch more nasty plots against the US. It is disgustingly easy to build an atomic bomb if you can lay your hands on thirty pounds of U-235 (I designed a workable one when I was in seventh grade), and there is a lot of it around.

Answer 8

No, I do not support Bush. He lied to the American people about Iraq, and seem to have absolutely no plan to get out.

Answer 9

YES we are killing terrorists wmds or not grow some nuts and back your country

Answer 10

NO, but I never supported him in the first place. I'm married to a Nam vet, my brothers all served also. My niece just joined the Air Force so we are not anti- military, just anti -stupidity. The only reason we are there is for Bush's cronies to get richer. Look who is making money off this war. Your children and mine are expendable, notice that there's are not.