What do you think of this idea? To stop the fighting you dangle a giant carrot in front of the fighters. If they continue fighting, they don't get the carrot. For example, you announce a $500 million grant over 10 years to scientists/people in the country requiring equal numbers of participants from all factions (as many as possible). If accepted, the money would help bring sides together for a common goal that would lead to development that would further prevent war and suffering. Sounds pretty cool, huh?
2006-12-18 09:03:34 · 4 answers · asked by xt_oo_tx 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I didn't know that. I bet you drive your grammar checker nuts.
Your idea is the precise thing that is going on now in Iraq, only the funding is in the billions, not millions. It is clear that the warring factions don't want to take part in building things up; they only want to blow things up. The solution is to end the terrorists support by Iran and Syria, open up the closed middle east to modern education and communication with the rest of the world, and end the idealogical support of the mindset that murder and destruction is good.
2006-12-18 09:17:29 · answer #1 · answered by mcmustang1992 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither the ecosystem nor financial develop could desire to be put in front of another. we are no longer conversing approximately oil and water, interior the experience that they can't blend. in certainty, Sustainable develop has been utilized by utilising industry for some years. The information is interior the pudding, that sustainable develop works! Lumber companies now decide to cut back sensibly, as a substitute of clean slicing a community. chosen timber are cut back, on an analogous time as others are left to advance, new ones are planted particularly than the felled timber. this way, the lumber companies will consistently have product to reap. This additionally minimizes, yet does not thoroughly do away with erosion of soil, or habitat loss. even with the undeniable fact that, that's lots extra powerful than the alternative... clean slicing. as a rely of certainty that people could desire to proportion this international, we will leave a footprint no rely what we do. even with the undeniable fact that, minimizing that footprint will leave the two us and the ecosystem in a extra powerful situation. To think of that economics could desire to be placed on the back burner is basically naive. without financial develop, how can you grow to be knowledgeable? holiday? How will people discover out approximately our international, and grow to be extra powerful stewards of the earth, if we are all out of a job and ravenous?? that's a supply and take relationship that people have with the ecosystem. we could desire to discover the main suitable stability between supply and take.
2016-10-05 11:37:49 · answer #2 · answered by riesgo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cool idea but it won't work and could cause the opposite. Just start a war and you get some incentive to stop?
2006-12-18 09:06:42 · answer #3 · answered by mikearion 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like communism. We all know how well communism worked in the USSR, so hey let's try it worldwide.
2006-12-18 09:07:04 · answer #4 · answered by x 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋