Politics & Government - 14 June 2006

A fetus is growing, and moving, so there's the first charisteristics. Reproduction comes later. And since ALL LIVING HUMANS(unless your illegal) are granted the basic rights, Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, by abortion we are breaking the fundamentals of the constitution. Thats the science side of it. Now I'm going to the theological side of it. The bible states that God knew you before you were born. That means that you have a soul. And anything with a soul must be alive. Now, can anyone tell me why abortion is legal?

2006-06-14 04:52:01 · 8 answers · asked by Randall M 2 in Law & Ethics

2006-06-14 04:50:55 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

The US congress voted last evening to give themselves a pay increase. (Foxnews.com)

2006-06-14 04:50:23 · 13 answers · asked by swampfox conservative 3 in Government

The French have never really been friendly to the U.S>
They gave us the Statue of Liberty, with the words, "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses..."
They knew the only way for the United Staes to be destroyed, was for it to destroy itself. Therefore, they knew we would embrace the Statue of Liberty, and they also knew that immigrants would come here illegally, which would lead to the destruction of the United States.

2006-06-14 04:47:12 · 21 answers · asked by Hickemtwiddle 4 in Immigration

i went to another country a month ago and i stay there for 3 weeks and never saw a pregnat girl but know that i came back home there are so many pregnat girls man is crazy.i think most of this people dont even use protection because they might think well any ways im gonna get wellfare when i have the baby.I know this girl she has 4 kids be 4 different guys and she lives of welfare you think that fair for the rest of us that we pay our taxes

2006-06-14 04:46:09 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

2006-06-14 04:45:08 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

2006-06-14 04:44:05 · 6 answers · asked by LE S 1 in Government

okay which pre. was better clinton: no debt, had the best economy, no wars but cheated on his wife. or bush: biggest debt in history, cant make a speach without pausing for like 12 thousand times, war, "hostile take over", and is just plain stupid

2006-06-14 04:43:50 · 52 answers · asked by elijahatienza 1 in Politics

2006-06-14 04:40:51 · 4 answers · asked by LE S 1 in Military

Do you think it was kinda dumb for your leader to go to Iraq? I, like most am not real happy with him but we all better hope nothing happens to him while he's in office. Just look at what we would have for our leader then. No thanks, I'll stick with the best of the worst. If the great white hunter [Chenny] were president we might as well kiss our asses googbye.

2006-06-14 04:39:49 · 17 answers · asked by don 6 in Government

2006-06-14 04:37:00 · 17 answers · asked by Terry W 2 in Politics

Bush tells the Americans that the illegals only took jobs no body else wanted. IF that is so why are they working in foodmarts? fast food resturants? factories?walmart?Car washes?ROAD side state jobs? CONTRUCTION jobs?Yard care jobs? Farm jobs paying $10 bucks an hour and more in some areas. AUTO REPAIR SHOPS? McDonalds?

2006-06-14 04:34:01 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

Combined with "solicit prostitution". State of NC

2006-06-14 04:33:32 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

Dear people of the world, specially if you live in the US, here's why I hate George W. Bush and why I protested when he came to my country.

Why I hate Bush:
1 - He got elected despite having around 500,000 votes less than Gore, what makes him illegitimate and undemocratic.
2 - He lied to the international community when he said that Iraq had WMDs, invading said country under false pretenses and without the support of the UN, or most of the international community, acting like the president of a rogue state, and doing so to be able to expand his lobbysts' (Halliburton, Lockheed-Martin, oil multinationals, etc.) economic interests in said country.

2006-06-14 04:31:19 · 52 answers · asked by Firefox 4 in Politics

or should it be a personal choice?
Also, how do you feel about the seatbelt law?
Is it the goverments job to make these decision's for us/or should it be a personal choice?

2006-06-14 04:28:52 · 9 answers · asked by swampfox conservative 3 in Law & Ethics

2006-06-14 04:25:29 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

Bush has an approval rating hovering at 30%. For most Americans, if we had that rating for a job we would be fired. Should we hold our elected officials to the same standard?

2006-06-14 04:24:00 · 20 answers · asked by anthonyrao72 1 in Politics

I'm fed up with hearing politicians on BOTH sides when referring to outsourcing state, "The jobs are gone and are NOT coming back." My response is, "WTH NOT?"

Since Nafta and other things have obviously failed then why not reverse them? Why not begin to create/change laws that give incentives for companies to stay within the USA. Start reversing crap that took them away.

Outsourcing is not just the minut jobs anymore. In India now, companies are moving there to get accountants, engineers, programmers, etc....

What can we do and doesn't everybody agree that we shouldn't just accept this 'live with it' answer the politicians are throwing at us?

2006-06-14 04:23:36 · 9 answers · asked by BeachBum 7 in Law & Ethics

2006-06-14 04:20:25 · 7 answers · asked by Tabulah Erassa 3 in Civic Participation

Does anyone here do anything to save our planet? Its seems to me that we are killing the earth but the people in power don't seem to care! Anyone agree?

2006-06-14 04:18:10 · 12 answers · asked by Lauren M 2 in Other - Politics & Government

is it through aids ,providing favourable market for what they produce, forgiving them loans as the y continue borrowing?, or providing for favourable policies that promote internal development stratigies?

2006-06-14 04:16:52 · 5 answers · asked by ugmaska 1 in Other - Politics & Government

does any one think its kinda strange that on 911 it was usama who attacked but instead of us attacking him and his group full force we some how got diverted to iraq and sadam and so called "weapons of mass destruction" and yet we still havent cought the main person that caused our countrys major down fall in a long time. plus we were okay with iraq when clinton was the president, it just seems like the bush both sr. and jr. want something more in the middle east, sr. tried in the early ninties, and now i guess you can say jr. succeded some how right?

2006-06-14 04:13:52 · 6 answers · asked by elijahatienza 1 in Military

and who are the other big time supporters of the alkida network?

2006-06-14 04:10:52 · 9 answers · asked by hunter 3 in Military

2006-06-14 04:08:49 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

A friend of mine takes care of a child for the last 5 yrs and has not reported it to the IRS. There is a court case against this family and she is afraid this may come up and someone may report this to the IRS. Would she be in trouble for not reporting it?

2006-06-14 04:08:43 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

2006-06-14 04:08:15 · 4 answers · asked by Curious 3 in Government

2006-06-14 04:07:58 · 29 answers · asked by fantasyman001 2 in Civic Participation

2006-06-14 04:07:43 · 4 answers · asked by lionbettycn 1 in Politics

In my last question, "Is This Racism?", the statement "If you do not give money to LAZY minorities, you are racist.". A member answered and pointed out that I needed to phrase my words to reflect what I meant. He was correct.

I did not intend to give the impression that minorities are lazy. I was refering to a small subgroup of every minority group, which includes a subgroup of whites. I admit my error, and I publically apologize for not phrasing my statement properly.

2006-06-14 04:07:41 · 10 answers · asked by Yes & No 3 in Immigration

2006-06-14 03:59:25 · 35 answers · asked by emeraldisle2222 5 in Other - Politics & Government