English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

I haven't read it, but if it is a work of fiction and advertised as such, then it's not false advertising! We do have freedom of speech and freedom of the press in this country-if you don't like it, don't read it. I bet someone reads it now because of your question just out of curiosity-so you just advertised for a book you find repulsive. Oops.

2006-06-14 04:40:47 · answer #1 · answered by curiositycat 6 · 0 0

You read Ann Coulter to get a clear view of the bias entrenched in the major media outlets. Coulter raises points that these outlets (the networks, the New York Times, Time) do not cover at all. Coulter always offers facts. If you are a left-wing headcase, who simply can't read anything that doesn't instantly agree with your world view, you hate Coulter. If you are far right-wing, and think liberals can't be honest about anything, you love Coulter. Coulter raises great points, her style is tongue-in-cheek sassy and combative, and she is an entertaining read as one gets perspective. Broaden your mind. Liberalism is a dying artifact. The Republicans have Bush fatigue. The true course lies somewhere in the middle. Coulter helps illuminate that true center by offering signposts that the major media won't publish.

2006-06-14 05:02:27 · answer #2 · answered by robabard 5 · 0 0

How do you know they are horrible and nasty if you haven't read the book? I bet you are basing your opinion solely on the Liberal news media that repeat statements out of context OR totally misrepresent the statements.

Case in point: Very few people know that Coulter is only criticizing "4" (I repeat 4!!) 9-11 widows...out of thousands of widows, I might add. Nothing could be further from the truth. She explains her criticism very well...and she has very valid points in her criticism of them. But the media makes it sound like she is going after all 9-11 widows.

Bottom line: The media has an agenda against Coulter. She is very unabashedly NOT politically correct, therefore they go after her because she speaks her mind. So, as the saying goes, "Don't judge a book by it's cover"...try reading it.

2006-06-14 05:33:43 · answer #3 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 0 0

Because simple minded people feel better about themselves by putting down someone else. Let's face it, Coulter's clientele are not the movers and shakers of the world. These are the people that haven't ever seen other parts of the world and have limited exposure to anything outside their limited range of experience. Like any other trash novelist, Coulter preys upon the fears and prejudice of people to sell her wares.

It's interesting that the Spell Check tried to change Coulter to "Colder".

2006-06-14 04:52:49 · answer #4 · answered by Net Bear 1 · 0 0

... Republicans don't quite understand that you can twist facts to say about anything you want, unless it's a Democrat who is talking...

like Al Franken who meticulously cites all of his material MUCH better than Coulter, Hanity or O'Riley if you look at it... And Michael Moore based his 9-11 movie all on facts you could look up from independent sites as well...

But in the end, it's all mostly the same... twisted fact to get you to believe what they want you to believe... or just support your own twisted beliefs with their twisted facts...

Sure there are always a few facts that EVERYONE would agree with... child molesters are bad and babies are cute... but those are to just draw in the reader's trust...

How can they see what Democrats are doing, yet not what Coulter, Hanity, Rush or O'Riley are doing? It's really amazing if you ask me?

2006-06-14 04:48:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I loved the e book of Enoch. I also examine the e book of Jasher. It replaced right into a lengthy time period in the past, yet I keep in suggestions wondering that there replaced into more desirable to what God printed than what's in the Bible. The Bible is the considerable component for me, yet I reject the dispositions of many who would say that if that isn't any longer in the Bible, it won't be able to be real. The Bible itself proves them incorrect as you've spoke of. also, the Apocrypha has a meaning. To lots of my fellow Protestants, you would imagine it meant 'cursed in case you examine it' through their reaction to it. yet I keep in mind that it skill "Hidden", and that intrigues me. what's this?! some thing that replaced into once in the Bible that many reject, meaning 'Hidden'?! enable me at it! lol and that i stumble on that I income from it. The Bible i'm utilising, the Oxford Bible with Apocrypha, has spoke of in it. They typically word any problems with the Apocrypha, exceptionally the historic problems with Judith that the readers can word and only bypass on with the tale. and that i stumble on that Esdras is riveting. Are the thoughts real? i imagine that there is a few reality to them. I also word that in the e book of Tobit, that even with if the tale will be pretend, or would no longer be pretend, someone knew what a guy of religion gave the impression of, as Tobit replaced right into a shining get jointly of religion, and that i ask your self why Paul did not comprise him in Hebrews 11. ( As i imagine that Paul wrote Hebrews ). all people who's Christian who needs to study about prophecy, exceptionally with regard to Revelation, could examine Esdras. In my humble opinion.

2016-10-30 21:22:37 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Have you read the book? Then how do you know it's horrible and nasty?

Just another sheeple believing what dumba ss critics are saying.

2006-06-19 08:17:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think the title really explains the author. I pity her most, because she is Godless, faithless, and souless. Sad for her and her money as it's the only thing she has. I much rather have my tears and soul and memories and love.

2006-06-14 04:43:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What she said is not FACT, it's her opinion combined with sensationalism and exageration in order to sell books. She knows controversy sells. I know even SHE doesn't believe any of the schmiel she spilled.

2006-06-14 04:40:36 · answer #9 · answered by Kookoo Bananas 1 · 0 0

Its called liberty. The right to speak freely. It's an American concept.

2006-06-14 04:42:14 · answer #10 · answered by Zee HatMan 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers