English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

Hillary Clinton is one crazy b****.
we would be totally screwed if she was in office.
good thing she would never be elected.
her points of view on every subject are just way too liberal.
we need to move more conservative these days.

but, neither has a good background for leading the country.
but actually Elizabeth Dole would be a great president.

Elizabeth Hanford Dole has had a long career in public service. She has served in significant positions for five presidents, including being the first woman to hold the position of Secretary of Transportation. In 1991 Dole was appointed President of the American Red Cross, the world's foremost humanitarian organization.

Dole graduated with distinction from Duke University in 1958. She earned a degree from Harvard Law School in 1965 and also holds a master's degree in education and government from Harvard. In 1971, Dole was appointed Deputy Assistant to President Nixon for Consumer Affairs, for which she received the National Safety Council's Distinguished Service Award in 1989. From 1973 to 1979, she was a member of the Federal Trade Commission.

As President of the American Red Cross from 1991-1999, Dole helped launch a sweeping transformation of the Red Cross Biomedical Services to incorporate medical technology to improve how the agency collects, tests and distributes more than one-half of the nation's blood supply. She led a dramatically successful effort that raised more than $562 million to assist victims of weather and non-weather related disasters. Under her leadership, the American Red Cross was consistently recognized for outstanding financial stewardship.

Dole, who has been named by the Gallup Poll as one of the world's most admired women, has received numerous awards for her public service and leadership, including the Women Executives in State Government Lifetime Achievement Award, the League of Women Voters Leadership Award and the Raoul Wallenberg Award for Humanitarian Service. She also was inducted in to the National Women's Hall of Fame in 1995.

There is NO woman who would be better at being president. Period!

2006-06-14 09:55:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

100%, without a single doubt -- Hillary. I don't know a single person who supports the current Bush in office...so why would they support any other Bush? Regardless of the affairs, Bill Clinton did a wonderful job as President, and Hillary was right by his side. She witnessed first-hand, if not participated in, the decision-making process. She knows how the job works, and how to succeed. I believe she may just be a little scared to do it. It's about time a woman ran for office, too. I believe if she ran, the overwhelming majority of women would vote for her on principal alone. And, since women outnumber men.....you could guess the outcome. I know for sure that the Democrats have GOT to get control over this country again. Bush has done nothing but ruin our reputation with all of our allies, and made us a target of every enemy country in the world. The world was a much safer place when a Clinton was in office. HILLARY 2008!

2006-06-14 12:01:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Laura Bush lacks experience in politics, (which may not be all bad). Hillary Clinton has lots of political experience, and would be the absolute worst thing for this country. Hillary is freedom's worst nightmare!!! She is a socialist! She is a reject from the hippie '60's that hates this country and its institutions and wishes to destroy it from within. Read any book about her, or talk to someone that knows her. Anybody but Hillary!!!
And to all the Bush bashers:
I don't support what Bush has done to the Republican party. But the reason we are in the state we are in (Post 9/11) is because of Bill Clinton's budget cuts to defense and the CIA. The Clinton economy was a result of "Reaganomics" of the '80's, and a lot of help from Alan Greenspan.
A lot of people answer this question with an "anybody but Bush" stance. Again, I don't support what Bush has done. But Hillary would be a lot worse!!!

2006-06-14 11:58:06 · answer #3 · answered by rduke88 4 · 0 0

Hillary Clinton

2006-06-14 11:54:39 · answer #4 · answered by halochick 3 · 0 0

First off, these women have names and are not just someone "wife".

Second, Laura Bush is not in the running. Hilary Clinton has not made it totally official yet.

If my choice were between the two, I would chose Clinton, no question. Haven't the Bush's proven they can't run a country well?

2006-06-14 11:59:29 · answer #5 · answered by MadforMAC 7 · 0 0

Hillary Clinton, she is a strong intelligent woman that is not afraid to stand up for what is right, she would have a great adviser in her husband, the last legally elected president. He was also the most successful at running the business of the country in over 40 years.

2006-06-14 11:55:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush's

2006-06-14 12:05:56 · answer #7 · answered by victoriaelaine2004 3 · 0 0

Hillary of course. She's smart and eloquent and informed. Bush is the opposite.

2006-06-14 11:55:37 · answer #8 · answered by Kookoo Bananas 1 · 0 0

No more Bush family, please. If it was a choice, Hliary would get my vote just to get the Bush family out of our government and stop putting us deeper and deeper in debt.

2006-06-14 11:56:08 · answer #9 · answered by Surfgirl2go 3 · 0 0

Sure in the hell not Clinton's!

2006-06-14 11:54:19 · answer #10 · answered by mikemadie 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers