English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Environment - October 2006

[Selected]: All categories Environment

Alternative Fuel Vehicles · Conservation · Global Warming · Green Living · Other - Environment

help on chemistry project!!!

2006-10-30 12:52:56 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

global estimate better, but US figures are ok

2006-10-30 12:02:17 · 1 answers · asked by flickerflix 1

When I logged on the EPA website and read an article on how to safe fuel, the author stated that letting the engine idle for a couple of minutes when you start it in the morning is just a waste of fuel. Instead the author proposed that we just continue driving and that the enine will warm itself up.

2006-10-30 11:31:34 · 7 answers · asked by budaklolo 4

Which process would most likely be affected?
A. Global warming
B. Ozone production
C. World population
D. Desertification

2006-10-30 11:23:17 · 3 answers · asked by Christopher R 1

2006-10-30 10:52:33 · 1 answers · asked by Princess cool 1

If it werent for energy efficiency we would still be living in caves. It is energy efficient improvements in our work (energy), that has taken human civilisation to our present predicament. The History of human civilisation is a story of energy efficient improvements in work practises. But instead of realising we have enough, that we are rich enough, and having a long long holiday to let the rest of the world catch up, We get fatter and fatter on the more and more **** that we stuff our whale like mouths, and chuck away. Ha. what would you do with the money you saved on energy efficiency? take a break. no way! you would add more **** to your pile, and cause more global warming! This is what we do. RENEWABLES are the answer. that and sharing the wealth and have a lifetime holiday, give the earth a break and us too! Now theres a new angle! Permaculture here we go

2006-10-30 10:38:32 · 7 answers · asked by green_womble 1

2006-10-30 10:12:43 · 6 answers · asked by paul_tuttle1959 2

If the earths human population continues to grow at the current rate, how long would it take before there was 1 person for every square metre of the earths surface?

2006-10-30 08:37:08 · 9 answers · asked by Dave B 1

What I mean is, there is so much starvation, pollution, fighting etc. Why can't we fix these problems first.........

2006-10-30 07:26:42 · 7 answers · asked by producedan 1

2006-10-30 07:22:39 · 8 answers · asked by Ross 1

We are the only country that mentions it day and day out on the tele.
Having returned from around the world trip I never saw it mentioned once on another Countries tele.

NOT ONCE

Yet the BBC mention all day and night every day and night.

And all the London nobs who are greeny hippy type cyclist's jump on the bandwaggon.

Who stopped Global warming after the last ICE AGE answer nature did not MR Blair and his TAX Collectors

2006-10-30 06:58:13 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

How much human energy is need to produced solar energy?
How much engery will solar power produced?
How much do we save from changing to solar power?
What are some benefit in changing to solar power?
How to install the panel?
Can solar energy provide enough energy for a whole school with the enrollment of 650 kids?
Is solar energy reliable?
How much will it cost to install the panels?
Do we need to have certified people install or check the panel?
Does it have any negative affect?
What happen if the solar panel fails?
Do we get reimbursed from the energy provider if we don't use the energy?

2006-10-30 06:41:07 · 4 answers · asked by Solar E 1

HM Taxes is coming to a place near you, we must save the world.

We will tax you here, We will tax you there we will tax you workers everwhere.

2006-10-30 06:35:25 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-30 06:24:09 · 2 answers · asked by Summer 1

abstract of historical development of pasteurization and sterilization preservation foods

2006-10-30 06:14:53 · 1 answers · asked by lekanlee 1

I heard that this month has been the hottest October for a very long time. Is this a sign of global warming or is it simply chance? I think it is chance because the pollution released and being released by humans is insignificant at the moment and for global warming to take effect takes a longer time. Like 50 years or so.

2006-10-30 05:58:35 · 6 answers · asked by Als 2

2006-10-30 05:24:57 · 2 answers · asked by badboy198920004 1

My classmate has wondered this for years.

2006-10-30 05:16:24 · 5 answers · asked by TraxAttack 3

One hundred years ago we produced more pollution than we do today !! Surprised??

In England the "Black Country" got its name because the entire area around Birmingham was black with soot. 100's of square miles covered in a black dust!!!

In terms of quantity of polluting gas during its last eruption Mount Etna in Sicily produced more greenhouse gas in one week then the entire human race did in the previous FIVE years !!!

Our planet has gone through identical changes to what we are experiencing right now many times over during the past 200 Million years. The data is there and we do have the technology to see it and examine it.

Mother Nature is much more powerful than us mere humans!!

Surprised?

PLEASE CHECK THE FACTS & ASK WHATS REALLY BEHIND ALL THIS?

2006-10-30 05:04:57 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-30 04:58:52 · 7 answers · asked by Cheekee 1

recent death of 3 person in chennai in a car found to be carbonmonoxide , due to inhaling the gas

2006-10-30 04:27:22 · 5 answers · asked by Ramesh n 1

meadows or parks have no trees in the middle rather theres a pond or not. what stops them from spreading on..

2006-10-30 04:05:19 · 2 answers · asked by makes tracks 1

fedest.com, questions and answers