I constantly read things like, "the human body is far too complex to have happened randomly."
Well, how many times throughout history have naysayers claimed supernatural explanation because any other answer *seemed* humanly impossible?
When you can't understand something, of course "god" looks attractive. But when a logical, natural explanation is presented, only a fool denies the reality set in front of them.
This is when theists' sputter, "well, religion doesn't claim to explain scientific phenomenon!" Why then is it constantly trying to dissect science, pointing towards an ever shrinking collective of things science can't yet explain as proof of its so called "infallibility?"
When religion is proven wrong, it always attempts to rationalize itself, because lets face it, any admission of fallacy completely undermines a doctrine that claims infallibility.
Science simply says, "I was wrong", and moves forward.
Isn't this the same thing humans do in order to grow?
2007-03-21
14:37:59
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous