If someone really studies the big bang theory, spontaneous life formation, and evolution, there are clearly MANY issues that contradict one another and others that are just implausible. If they are men and women of science, as they claim, why can't they even fully understand the theories that they so readily spout off? And why can't they immediately come up with complete, scientific answers to all the inquisitions about their scientific facts? If they tell me that I am related to a woodchuck, isn't the burden of proof on them to prove this beyond any scientific doubt? When are they going to do that? And how can such people of science claim they left a cult of religion because of its contradictions and falsehoods, then move into a cult that reads comic books about science fiction experiments done in the 50s which are largely discredited now? How can an atheist claim to be searching for the truth, yet clearly support a belief full of contradictions and lies
2007-02-27
11:36:08
·
27 answers
·
asked by
Matt
4