Someone said this as a response to my last question regarding Hell: "in fact it makes more sense to belive in it,than to belive AGAINST it. why? you can't observe that something like that does NOT exist. you can merely observe that you can't observe that it IS there."
So... I suspect this person believes in EVERYTHING. Unicorns, Thor, Aphrodite, the Great Spaghetti Monster, a teapot orbiting the Earth, etc. These things can't be DISPROVED. So one MUST believe in them, huh? That's what the argument sounded like.
Believe in everything unless it's disproved.
That's exactly what theism is. To believe until it's disproved.
The burden of proof is on the theists. They make the claim. It is not up to anyone else to disprove it. That's going against the Scientific Method.
Nor is it up to atheists to prove there is no god. You can't prove a negative.
2006-12-12
16:03:45
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality