English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 12 September 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070912/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq

Read this!

2007-09-12 11:18:06 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-12 10:47:03 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I hear all this talk about how we are torturing people. I just thought I'd throw this out there.

2007-09-12 10:42:53 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Please, if you can use facts it would be appreciated.

2007-09-12 10:40:21 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

What would be your top 3 contributions? For example,
Healthcare
Social Security
Space Program

2007-09-12 10:36:14 · 5 answers · asked by Not so looney afterall 5

Im not so sure that they are and the current just keeps creating more crap everyday

2007-09-12 10:35:36 · 15 answers · asked by nimisisprime 3

I mean really, who does John Edwards think he's fooling?

2007-09-12 10:18:05 · 12 answers · asked by Private Deek 2

Would the American left have new found respect for the US military?

2007-09-12 10:13:55 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why or why not?

2007-09-12 10:11:07 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

do you find this to be the case as well?

2007-09-12 10:10:54 · 1 answers · asked by Private Deek 2

Don't you realise people like him can save your country from your president?

2007-09-12 09:57:42 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Sure seems so. Why won't democrats stand against this multi million dollar organization when they disagree with them?

Or do all liberals agree with moveon.org.

2007-09-12 09:57:39 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

It seems to me that when ever the Europeans needs us the USA is their favorite people but once the danger passes then we are the scum of the earth. Maybe we should have just let Hitler have their way with them. The created the problem maybe we should have let them solve it.

2007-09-12 09:51:05 · 11 answers · asked by Ethan M 5

The War on Poverty was introduced by President Lyndon B. Johnson during his State of the Union address on January 8, 1964. After spending countless billions on social programs to help the poor and we are no closer to winning this war than when we started.

The war on drugs was started in its broadest sense, in 1880, when the U.S. and China completed an agreement (see Opium wars) that prohibited the shipment of opium between the two countries. Over the past 126 years, we have spent billions of dollars and have not won this war.

The War on Terrorism was started at the 1972 Olympics by the PLO and the terrorist have been attacking us for over 35 years now. Until 9/11/2001 we did not respond. Why do the dems think that after 6 years of effort, we are going to be able to erraticate a problem that has been going for at least 41 years.

2007-09-12 09:48:51 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

are there any valid proof for this?

thanks

2007-09-12 09:45:58 · 25 answers · asked by Moore55 4

That goin good libs?

You get them troops home yet?

How about those Downing Street Memos, you ever find the ORIGINALS yet?

2007-09-12 09:43:06 · 16 answers · asked by Private Deek 2

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/vitter_flynt;_ylt=AiTu3dMMTz67gqn1EnIb1OcKO7gF

2007-09-12 09:39:26 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Let's forget for a minute that the rationale for this war seems to change weekly and just focus on Saddam. Many people think deposing his rule was itself a good reason to invade. Usually you will hear "he gassed his own people" or "he was a tyrant". Both are true. What is also true is that he the gas he used was supplied to him by US, yes the US government, and after he used it we did nothing as we did nothing when he attacked the Kurds again after the Gulf War. So isn't that kind of an outdated, if not self incriminating, argument?

And do you think sending 150,000 soldiers to capture one man is really the reason we are still there?

2007-09-12 09:36:14 · 5 answers · asked by douglas l 5

and you may be subject to citizen street justice. Is it really worth it Timmy?

2007-09-12 09:35:41 · 12 answers · asked by Private Deek 2

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57506

2007-09-12 09:30:19 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-12 09:29:44 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am no fan of Preident Bush and believe he is not a good president. ( just thought I would clarify that for you) Does this hatred affect your everyday lives and does a day go by where you dont think about it? Finally has all enjoyment of life stopped for you because of this hatred? I am no being a smarta**, this is a serious question.

2007-09-12 09:26:50 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

hes a good skeaker and that is what it seams to take to get the libs on your side, big words

2007-09-12 09:20:00 · 19 answers · asked by evilmonk66 2

2007-09-12 09:10:51 · 18 answers · asked by Claire 2

I'll take "no but... " as a yes.

2007-09-12 09:03:39 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

It's quite entertaining how certain political groups make fun of a Yale graduate. I wonder what Ivy League college these very people graduated from?

2007-09-12 09:00:56 · 21 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3

See, the Democrats are running out of victims. The affluence in this country is good. We had the poverty statistics last week. The poverty in this country is not what it was. The Democrats need uneducated, unmotivated, voters. They need people to depend on them. They're going to have to create them. So the way they're going to do this -- to say that they destroy the country, we've gotta define that, because we have to be very careful here. This is an important point, and it's accurate, but when you say, "destroy the country," it can cause people to be turned off and not listen to what you say. They want to remake the country. They don't like capitalism. They don't like freedom, because that's when they lose elections. When people are economically prosperous, the last thing they need is government. When they are economically prosperous and growing, the last thing they need is government programs of any kind. The Democrats are desperate to have as many people dependent on government as possible, because government is the engine of their control and view of the country.

That's why they're trying to come up with all of these stealth health care plans and things, to get as many people as possible, depending on the government, for a need. Now, I happen to think health care is not a "need." I think it's a "desire." (But that's an argument for a different day.) You know, we all have wants and needs. The Democrats are trying to persuade as many people as possible to let them be in charge of supplying their needs, and the Democrats know that they cannot do that in a means of prosperity for everybody, so everybody will end up being in a situation of increased need without being educated or trained in order to provide for it themselves. It's about control of the population as a means of attaining total power that they can't lose, because at that point they'll never be voted out. Too many people will be dependent on them. Look at the black vote: 90% every year. Why? Well, it's what they're trying to do with the Hispanic vote. Look at the union vote. Look at the union money that comes in. You can look at their various constituency groups and find out how they planned to do it for the whole country. So it's not that they're trying to destroy it. They don't want America to stop being America. They just want to change the way it's structured. The way I put it is that they want to destroy the traditions and institutions that define this country's greatness, because they don't include liberals.

People have to understand what liberalism is. Liberalism, socialism, communism, you have to understand what it is versus conservatism. Conservatism puts total faith and confidence in the individual. "You go out there, pal, and do the best you can. We want to set up circumstances that make it possible for you to be the best you can be," and we do that by getting government and regulation and obstacles out of your way. The Democrats want total control of government for the purposes of securing their power. Now, there are some Republicans like that, too. That's why I'm not saying "Republicans and Democrats" here. I'm saying "conservatives and liberals."

2007-09-12 08:59:39 · 15 answers · asked by mission_viejo_california 2

always attack me for my grammer? it seems that cons dont care and just read what you have to say but libs will attack you if yoiu mispell things

2007-09-12 08:54:28 · 37 answers · asked by evilmonk66 2

fedest.com, questions and answers