Politics - 14 September 2007

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=12146&offer=&hidebodyad=true


Many say the cartoons were blasphemy
but muslims newpapers make fun of jews
and christians all the time
Anybody shall have the right too express
art in public newspapers.
That must newer be controlled from
countries far away from us



The story with the cartoons began with
An author who wanted too make a Danish children book of Muhammeds life so Danish children would know about his life But no Danish cartoonist would make any picture in the book in ther own name
So jyllandsposten edittor ask his own staff of 12 satirecartoonist too make 1 satirecartoon of muhammed and they did It
they must have balls those Danes
The muslims never blow up any booms in denmark
The muslim only kill themself in wild demonstation
Danes 0 dead vs muslimworld 260 deads
Maybe muslims fear the danes because they used too be ferce Wikings
And didn´t dare too hurt them.

2007-09-14 23:18:29 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Isn`t America great ????.......Of course it is. That`s why all the "backward people" look to the U.S. to save them.... "To Save them you say?" You say ???....Don`t be silly.....You know in your heart what America is and how the entire world enveys America..........But for you leftists.........You`ll never get it..You are ruled by your emotions......so this is wil I will end my rational efforts....

2007-09-14 23:09:35 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Thank you very much!

2007-09-14 22:28:52 · 9 answers · asked by Phenix 1

General Petraeus doesn't even know!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=KvpfYwKR6lo

2007-09-14 22:24:33 · 14 answers · asked by aspiring_paranormal_journalist 4

WASHINGTON, Sept. 13, 2007

(AP) The saga of the scandal-plagued Democratic fundraiser with ties to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton took another strange twist after he mailed a suicide note last week to a legal organization.

A person who saw the letter said Thursday that the note from Hong Kong-born Norman Hsu explicitly stated that he "intended to commit suicide." The person declined to reveal the exact phrasing, but said it was not rambling in nature.

The individual spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly about it.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/13/politics/main3258407.shtml?source=RSSattr=Politics_3258407

Hmm, didn't convicted Clinton Whitewater partner James McDougal die in prison under mysterious circumstances?
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/03/08/mcdougal.update/

If you ask me, it's all too convienent that an alleged Hsu "suicide note" suddenly turns up...what is this a prelude to????

2007-09-14 22:21:14 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-14 21:17:51 · 15 answers · asked by bottle babe 4

and rarely get answers and even those are devoid of intelligent rationale? Meanwhile liberals tend to give me answers that are very nicely written, balanced, even admitting some flaws in the democratic positions, even criticizing democratic lawmakers at times,and exhibiting a true passion and reverence not for a man or a political party but rather a respect and love for the constitution of these United States???

Why do the republican responses seem like they come from people who have anger management problems and say things like, you should be shot for calling general Petraeus a traitor?

2007-09-14 20:58:45 · 12 answers · asked by ez f 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Usd9V21H7u4


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTOQUnvI3CA

2007-09-14 20:40:30 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

never actually answer questions from logical people seeking honest debate about the war and politics etc.? They just answer with "Why do liberals blah blah blah?"

Also, well-thought-out, literate, and sensible questions are always labeled as "Bush-bashing" or "a rant". This I do not understand. If you have nothing valid to offer to the debate, then why throw your useless two cents in?

I can feel some idiotic Bush-touting answers as I write this. Please, prove me right!

2007-09-14 20:38:52 · 14 answers · asked by Chara Pointshot 4

So it looks like Move on.org was correct.

When will republicans apologize to Moveon.org?

2007-09-14 20:08:36 · 9 answers · asked by ez f 1

2007-09-14 19:55:19 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

A) Iraqi Civilians

B) Iraqi Security Forces

C) Coalition Troops

2007-09-14 19:33:06 · 5 answers · asked by Richard V 6

He was an outstanding statesman that ended the Vietnam War that the liberals started.

2007-09-14 19:29:07 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

I need a breakdoown of all the counties in the US that recieve welfare from either a government source or a fairly reliable and relatively unbiased source.

Thank you in advance

2007-09-14 19:06:02 · 1 answers · asked by Jon 4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/george_w._b...

Quote) •Bush is not credited with any medals on this discharge, although he was authorized two: the National Defense Service Medal for 6 months of active duty and a pistol qualification badge. He lost the pistol qualification when he was stripped of all his qualifications but the NDSM should be here and its lack shows that not only was he stripped of all his qualifications but his medals also." (end quote)

LOL--BUSH received ZERO HONORS!

Never has there been one so DISGRACED to be STRIPPED of every ribbon and yet received a honorable discharge.
No country , has a soldier who served 5 1/2 years without ONE honor. None ...except, the U.S A. LOL--our preztent! LOL
One may say WIKIPEDIA is a bad source. Well...Go change it. Simple nuff???
I offer a $1 reward if you can prove he was not stripped, and did recive ONE SINGLE HONOR. Or $1 if you show another soldier, in any army, anywhere, so disgraced he didnt get DISHONERABLY DISCHARGED

2007-09-14 18:54:38 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Stossel points out what makes our health care system so great. And how getting government out of it and actually letting the free market and competition make it even greater and cheaper. As opposed to the train wreck alternative of handing it over to the government to run.

2007-09-14 18:51:02 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I just wanna know. Dont need to elaborate, just a simple Success or Failure answer will do. Thanks.

2007-09-14 18:42:24 · 20 answers · asked by Nanook~Maybe I need a longer Name?~ 6

2007-09-14 18:38:54 · 12 answers · asked by Tilakpal baghel 1

regarding freedom and what it means?

We must be willing to sacrifice in order to keep that freedom for future generations!!

Right?

2007-09-14 18:37:40 · 14 answers · asked by Jeremiah Johnson 7 7

If all Americans believed exactly what you believe, politically... would America be great...and remain great?

2007-09-14 18:34:52 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Of thats right they don't care because it's the middle class getting screwed again. Why don't we make Iraq pay in oil revenue for policeing their country during a civil war.

What do you think?

2007-09-14 18:33:27 · 39 answers · asked by Anonymous

to a Democrat?

bin Laden opposes legal abortion, he opposes gay marriage, he opposes secularism, and he opposes gun control. Isn't that pretty much the Republican Party Platform???

2007-09-14 18:21:55 · 28 answers · asked by truth seeker 7

Decades?

(To the uneducated--that would mean: "More than 10 years.")

We've already spent close to $1T dollars in just 5 years of war alone--not counting the costs of healthcare, benefits, and whatnot for our troops.

Estimates are that for ten more years until 2017 or 2018--the cost of this occupation would total $3T dollars.

Now, let's jump ahead 50 years; to 2057.

Cost of occupation then: Estimated to be $15T dollars.

And this is not counting the added costs of veteran care, benefits, etc...associated with the troops--including the costs of replacing equipment and whatnot.

Now WHO do you suppose is going to pay for all this? And do you think it will be worth it--when faced with this kind of a bill?

Is it worth wrecking our own economy in the process--just to see this war through to the end? When people say we haven't sacrified anything, we can point out the following: Stagnant wages, rising healthcare costs, cost of living, lack of affordable education...?

2007-09-14 18:12:33 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

how many people do you think are on welfare?

and how often do you think liberals vote... and people on welfare vote?

these are issues you talk about alot... so I would assume you have some good ideas as to the specifics...
(this is a good time you can show off your "facts" you're always talking about conservatives... maybe even cite where you got the info)

2007-09-14 18:07:49 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070914/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_us_iraq

I guess uniting the most dangerous, terrorist-breeding lunatics on the planet in their mutual hatred of us is one way to do it...

2007-09-14 18:00:37 · 14 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6

1.) If carbon dioxide is responsible for increasing temperatures on earth, how do you explain the observed temperature increases on Mars where there are no automobiles, airplanes, or industrial plants emitting CO2?
2.) If man made carbon emissions are responsible for global warming, why did the temperature actually increase during the beginning of the 20th century prior to the greatest increase in carbon emissions after 1940? And why did the temperature actually decrease from 1940 to 1970 during the greatest increase in carbon emissions?

2007-09-14 17:55:53 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-14 17:45:44 · 19 answers · asked by Kelly B 4

What do you want your tax money spent on?

2007-09-14 17:42:04 · 23 answers · asked by Kelly B 4

For some reason, there are an uncomfortably large number of people whom I've encountered thinking that our government needs to be either democratic or republican. These same people despise the opinions of people on the other side of the fence.

Why can't they see how much the right needs the left, and the left needs the right?

Republicans are realists. They're able to implement policies that guarantee our international safety, as well as the safety of our country's economy. However, many claim they do so without much compassion; often sticking to the constitution instead of the general will of the people.

Inversely, democrats are idealists. They're often proposing the hypothetical solutions, the best case scenarios. This (in my opinion) isn't always realistic for our country, but on an emotional and personal level, it makes more sense to me.

(This is just an interpretation of politicians' beliefs and morals, not their actions, which tend to stray in all sorts of crazy directions.)

It is for these reasons that democrats and republicans need to realize how vital it is that they learn to utilize their opposites' strengths in order to compensate for their weaknesses. Republicans can modify democratic ideas and theories in order to make them more realistic in the real world, and spending time with the Democrats will grant the hardcore Conservatives the opportunity to grow a soul. Win-win, no?

What do you think?

2007-09-14 17:21:35 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or is it merely human nature?

2007-09-14 17:18:24 · 18 answers · asked by Kelly B 4