Cause they don't have any intelligent rational explanations for their positions.
Ever asked one of them to explain why we invaded iraq and occupy iraq? you are likely to get insulted, name called, and if by chance you get an attempt at an explanation it makes a fallacious logical leap like "have you forgotten what they did to us on 9/11"? lol......the implication being that iraq attacked us on 9/11. lol these people are nuts....they are illiterate, uneducated moronic buffoons who are only capable of reciting their Oreilly talking points.
2007-09-14 20:48:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by ballerb j 1
·
2⤊
7⤋
Post a sensible question and wait for a sensible post. What adds up to a sensible question for you might not make sense to someone on the other side. For example, finding an article based on rumor, with no supporting name associated with it, is often used in the creation of a question that is inherently antagonistic in it's presentation.
Therefore, since liberals tend to do the same thing, it boils down to being simple human nature. Since the moveon.org attack on General Petreaus, I like to make a point of the traitorous potential of Hillary Klintler based on her duplicitous nature. The same for Barack Osama's potential for being an Islamic sleeper terrorist. Both have as much possibility, perhaps more, than the dubious crap posted against those leaders who are conservatives.
2007-09-14 21:06:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Any question that starts off with "Why do conservatives..." or "Why do liberals..." is already biased. These questions can not be taken seriously because of comments like the last one in your question. You automatically assume that anyone who is a Republican/conservative will be an idiot and jump to defending Bush.
There really is no difference between Republicans or Democrats. A majority of politicians (on all sides) are out for power. They do not stand by issues because they agree with them, they stand by them because that's what the rest of their party is doing. Don't categorize a politician's (or anyone else's) worth or intelligence by what political party they belong to. Instead, try actually hearing them out and seeing where they stand on issues.
2007-09-14 21:15:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by little_ash_2003 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well what questions are you posting? It seems that you already have a certain bias. I enjoy reading various points on all types of subject matter. In the end though what you and I may or may not agree/disagree upon will be moot. Our government is no longer a reflection of the people in this country.
2007-09-14 20:51:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Why do liberals accuse others of what you are guilty of the most?
We ask questions to make people think. Its what intelligent people do.
Simply repeating "Bush lied", or "Bush is stupid", or "Impeach Bush" is just Bush bashing.
If you want people to respond to you intelligently, be intelligent.
2007-09-14 22:04:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Avatar_defender_of_the_light 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I would be happy to answer a logical question from anyone, provided that the questioner did not make prior assumptions as to my answer. Your question is not a well thought out, logical, sensible question, but one designed to invoke anger.
2007-09-14 20:48:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by lyllyan 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
The questions usually contain a false premise, like "since Bush is really Hitler....", blah blah blah
2007-09-14 20:43:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋
Why do you generalize an entire group based on some. Liberals here do the same thing, and you are a fool to say no to that. I answer questions posted, but if you look, you will see they are only BS questions like "Are you amazed at how much Republicans lie" Before you criticize others, take a look at yourself and your group.
EDIT: When I said look at your group, notice the one below me. He calls us illiterate, yet he makes several spelling errors and grammatical errors. He bases all his arguments on a grudge and any rational person can see that.
2007-09-14 20:43:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by rosslambert 4
·
11⤊
3⤋
Pot, meet Kettle.
I do owe you a debt of gratitude. I thought liberals were supposed to be tolerant, but you've dis-proven that wacky theory.
2007-09-14 20:56:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by DOOM 7
·
6⤊
2⤋
Why do you assume all conservatives are Bush bots?
2007-09-14 20:42:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by DannyK 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
They don't its your immagination or you delusional fixations on Michael Moore or Hillary Clinton.
2007-09-14 21:09:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋