hes a good skeaker and that is what it seams to take to get the libs on your side, big words
2007-09-12 09:20:00 · 19 answers · asked by evilmonk66 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Dude, he doesn't speak anymore...he's dead.
2007-09-12 09:26:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
The time has changed, vastly with advance in the in science and technology, changing the whole world to a new order, though all the odds remains! Even the Hitler would have been changed to behave better! But the top man in the white house, seems to have taken granted that the public at large would simply and blindly follow what he say! So currently Bush is more powerful than what the Hitler had in his lifetime
2007-09-12 09:45:38 · answer #2 · answered by anjana 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually Hitler was a fascist... fascism is on the extreme right of the political spectrum (look in a government text book if you don't believe me). Hitler presented a aggressive reactionary government that basically toppled the democracy in Germany in the '30s. Liberals in Germany at that time were imprisoned and fleeing.
And no, Hitler, would not be a better president than George Bush. Maybe he would be a better president in your eyes since you are obsessed with liberals (Hitler was). And I don't think that Bush wants to kill or imprison liberals. Bush is a lot of things but he is not a Hitler.
2007-09-12 09:28:19 · answer #3 · answered by cattledog 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Hitler had his uniforms designed by ability of Hugo Boss. that's real. Bush is lacking interior the form branch. Bush eats lots greater meat than Hitler. Hitler did no longer ought to hassle approximately CNN whilst he invaded coutries. Hitler grew to become right into a self-made guy, started in poverty, grew to become right into a wounded conflict veteran. Bush is regardless of the different of it truly is. Hitler actual wrote a pair books. no person accused Hitler of being stupid. Bush, on the different hand...
2016-11-10 06:22:53 · answer #4 · answered by baskette 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush has a long way to go to catch up. Hitler murdered millions of innocent people, but Bush is only somewhere between 100,000 and 600,000 (depending on the information source). So far.
But Bush already is the worst mass-murderer the world has seen SINCE **Pol Pot**. He's on a roll!
2007-09-12 09:33:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, I don't think so. He and Bush have some things in common because, like Hitler, Bush does not listen to the people's wishes but forges ahead with his own regime.
2007-09-12 09:32:52 · answer #6 · answered by Ladybug II 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No. Hitler would not make a better president than Bush. Equal, perhaps but not better.
2007-09-12 09:33:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Only to liberals who seem to see and fear the same 'Zionist conspiracy' that Hitler did.
Bush has a long long way to go before he even catches up to Bill Clinton in the cold-blooded deliberately evil department.
2007-09-12 09:58:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Would everyone just shut up with all the hitler referrences unless you actually take the time and study him
2007-09-12 09:31:31 · answer #9 · answered by Captain Obvious 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Ask the relatives of the six million Jews that he killed!
2007-09-12 09:33:23 · answer #10 · answered by Mercedes 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Earlier today evilmonk66 claimed that he uses spell check. Does anybody think he was telling the truth?
2007-09-12 09:30:30 · answer #11 · answered by spicoli 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋