Politics - 11 September 2007

2007-09-11 16:59:36 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-11 16:57:28 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Just because he has been out of office for nearly 7 years surely doesn't mean we can't find a way to blame him for the second recession of the Bush presidency does it?
http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2007/09/06/feds_poole_recession_now_more_likely/

2007-09-11 16:52:49 · 11 answers · asked by Sageandscholar 7

The Oklahoma City Federal Building? It was the second worst terrorist attack in the US. It was planned and executed by a pair of far right christian militia sympathizers in revenge for the Ruby Ridge and Waco incidents, the Brady Bill, and tax increases.

May the 168 who died and the over 800 injured never be forgotten.

Bonus question - since these terrorists were republicans, should we invade Texas?


http://www.amazon.com/American-Terrorist-Timothy-McVeigh-Oklahoma/dp/0060394072/ref=pd_bbs_2/104-6061274-3861512?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1189568717&sr=8-2
.

2007-09-11 16:48:33 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

All we see are talking head pundits and blathering rhetoric.
Why are the images of war so frightening to the media?
Does it scare away advertisers?
Politcal pressure?
Don't think the viewers can handle it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAHQsGtgWQc&mode=related&search=s?

2007-09-11 16:43:22 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Such as with The OKC bombing, it the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon were done by White Christian Americans, would you more or less angry or indifferent?

2007-09-11 16:40:40 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-11 16:40:24 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-11 16:39:38 · 9 answers · asked by Andrea 3

Have you ever noticed that when you mention the word "poll" in relation to the President, the administration, or the Iraq war, you always have conservatives questioning the accuracy and legitimacy of polls?
Yet, it seems these same Bush lackeys are the first to jump up and spout off about the "Democratic" Congress' approval ratings.
Okay, do you believe the polls or don't you. Or are you guys simply "flip floppers".

2007-09-11 16:37:46 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

i bet they spent hours thinking about how to insult a man who is smarter, more experienced, and braver than them. it's so hilarious because it rhymes! ya get it? get it? hahaha why aren't you laughing it's funny! it rhymes! don't you get it?!

2007-09-11 16:36:16 · 2 answers · asked by f0876and1_2 5

however why do we still have to hear from slick Willie who took advantage of a young intern, had sex in the oval office, and then lied under oath. If any other exec did this and the company found out they would be thrown out. Yet slick Willie is still the darling of the media and the libs. Way to go you women's libber hypocrites.

What is the standard? They either all go or we forgive them all. What sort of a message does this send to the youth. It's ok to do this kind of stuff if your a liberal since you probably have no morality anyway, but if you're a conservative you have a higher moral standard and a higher legal standard.
I say throw them all out.

2007-09-11 16:35:17 · 7 answers · asked by songndance1999 4

I wonder why does this Osama bin laden only comes at the times when the elections are coming in USA. Maybe its because he can make more enemies and most probably because he can help the anti-Islam US candidates to win elections. Bush said that osama helped him with re election.

This fake osama is a big help to the US political parties as it was a help for President Bush in recent elections when he (osama) helped bush to win elections. Bush himself said soon after his re election as a president that osama had been a help for him. (see his speeches soon after his re election as president)

Same will happen this time, these fake osama's will come out till the elections and untill the bush based parties win he wont go and next time he will appear in the elections after these ones.

2007-09-11 16:32:20 · 16 answers · asked by Ayaz Ali 4

They are killing each other, and we are trying to maintain the peace. Saying that we are causing the death of innocent civilians by our presence alone, is like blaming the police for crime. It doesn't make any sense. If we sent troops into Darfur, to stop the killing that is taking place there (which I think we should) would our troops be blamed for civilian deaths there, as well?

2007-09-11 16:28:22 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

...yet swear up and down the reason we're in Iraq is because of it's violations of UN resolutions?

hypocrisy is such a great word.........

2007-09-11 16:27:56 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Rumsfeld visited Iraq again on 24 March 1984; the same day the UN released a report that Iraq had used mustard gas and tabun nerve agent against Iranian troops.

2007-09-11 16:27:29 · 8 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

2007-09-11 16:19:41 · 22 answers · asked by easy_game_101 2

I'm 17 years old , I just finished a book on political science (289 pages) , and I want to publish it , how do I publish it?

2007-09-11 16:09:21 · 11 answers · asked by Adam 2

One minute Patraus says "The Iraqi's are making progress" the next minute he says "The progress isn't enough for them to take control yet."

It's been 5 years. We train soldiers in 5 weeks.

One minute Patraus says "We are making Progress" How come no one asks why the British are leaving? Don't they know we are making progress?

Patraus = "Stay the course"

I say
1) if it's so important than start the draft.
2) seize the oil corps to pay for it. It's now a matter of national security.

add your own contradictions.

2007-09-11 16:07:33 · 5 answers · asked by easy_game_101 2

that I don't understand it what say you?

2007-09-11 16:05:06 · 14 answers · asked by Ethan M 5

It seems to me that their is a schism in our country between the conservative right and the liberal left. We are at each others throats all the time, we can't agree at all on the same issues, and we seek to dominate and control the other all the time. Will this behavior eventually lead to our country splitting into two, and if this happens, what will be the factor that will crack the dam?

2007-09-11 16:03:50 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

What DO they know?

2007-09-11 15:58:53 · 12 answers · asked by Enigma 6

Does that mean that Bill Clinton lied too?


http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/18/iraq.political.analysis/

2007-09-11 15:58:29 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

That's downright mean.

2007-09-11 15:55:34 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Transponders (Mode-2, Mode-C, Mode-S) transmit an aircrafts heading, speed, altitude, and ident. This info is requested by the ground based Beacon Interrogator commonly referred to as the Secondary Radar (not really a radar).

Primary Radar (ASR-8/9/ or 11) paint a target with a 1 microsecond pulse and awaits the return of the signal. A primary Radar *** DOES NOT *** require a transponder to track a target. Primary radars are often paired with Secondary Radars -aka- Transponder Beacon Interrogators. The ASR-9/ and 11 are also Doppler Radars, which use phase detection for higher resolution, which then allows Air Traffic to decrease aircraft separation. They see anything moving to include six levels of weather.

CT #4 response here:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070911170250AAmuyft&r=w

2007-09-11 15:50:24 · 11 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

I've noticed virtually all neo-con christians are for low taxes because they wan't more of their money to themsleves. I've heard by many, "Why should I give my hard earned dollar to lazy people who live on welfare," or "I refuse to support those illegal aliens." Are these people completely oblivious that they are contradicting the teachings of their leader, and I'm not talking about GWB(even though some of them clearly worship him); I'm speaking of Jesus. Jesus, according to the scriptures loved all people and believes that all people need to look out for their fellow man no matter what. This principle was emphesized in relation to the poor. So why are so many NEO-CONS against taxes for social welfare and wellness when it is clearly what their lord would want?

2007-09-11 15:42:58 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

No progress?

2007-09-11 15:40:16 · 22 answers · asked by .................... 2

now gay rights. Not to mention native american rights, which isnt even considered.
was 1968 that long ago?
are conservatives "all better now"

2007-09-11 15:35:13 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean, If stupid people didn't vote, then canidates would have to actually deal with issues, not catchphrases.

2007-09-11 15:29:49 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-11 15:23:42 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

She shows up with Bush in Iraq and at same time as Patreus "Sunshine Report" to Congress.

2007-09-11 15:22:18 · 9 answers · asked by Thomas Paine 5