Such as with The OKC bombing, it the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon were done by White Christian Americans, would you more or less angry or indifferent?
2007-09-11 16:40:40 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
i really can't say i'm angry about either one because neither one affected me. it does seem like short haired, white guy, christian terrorists are forgotten a lot faster than any other terrorists though. we did'nt have any of our rights taken from us or form a bogus office (homeland security) to "protect" us after okc either.
2007-09-11 16:52:09 · answer #1 · answered by che_lives 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would be more upset if it turns out that 9/11 was done by the CIA.
We may know the truth about 9/11 in about 50 years, when those truly responsible for 9/11 are dead.
2007-09-11 23:47:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Professor Steven Jones has actually tested steel samples from the towers, he definitely found thermate traces. The one major thing he did point out was 'yellow molten metal' flowing from the impact floors. Its on all the news footage so theres no denying it happened. Now the only material on earth that can flow yellow in a liquid state is thermate (Im no scientist but I would presume its the sulfur that makes it appear yellow.) Now Ive seen the videos, so have millions of people , most without realising what they were looking at. But Steven Jones is a very learned man, he studies things like this, and I believe what he has found is definite proof of thermate cutting charges. If you believe Bush's story or not you need to watch a free to air doco called "911 Mysteries" it offers up a multitude of reasons why 911 happened the way it did, most if not all of them scarily believable.....
The film maker Sofia Smallstorm cannot tell you that it definitely was an inside job, all she does is present the facts and once youve watched it you will start thinking....that much I can promise you.
And one more thing while Im here........the Bush apologists will always argue that the steel didnt need to melt to cause the floors to collapse, thats fair enough BUT. What they expect us to believe is that the support clips all failed at the impact floors which caused a pancake effect right??? Seems like a reasonable argument, even the official report tells us the floors pancaked. But there is one major flaw that they cant explain and Ill tell you what it is. For a floor to pancake it has to fall through space to hit the floor beneath it, this breaks the supports holding up the lower floor and so on (about 80 times till the mass reaches ground level.) now even if we give each floor an amazingly fast half second to travel through that space crushing all the support steel, girders, steel mesh, interior walls, office furniture etc, the real world time for the impact floors to reach ground level should have been around 40 seconds!!! (thats 80 storeys collapsing in a half second each!!!!
That plainly did not happen because THERE WAS NO PANCAKING!!!! The towers dropped within 14 seconds, almost as fast as freefal speed!!! And the only way that could have happened was by severing the 48 steel columns at the core, and probably severing the foundation steel in the basements also, there is no two ways about it.
The Bush apologists physics dont hold up to scrutiny, they dont hold up to critical analysis, and why so many videos all over the net showing survivors and firemen, cops and reporters all mentioning explosions inside the buildings?
2007-09-11 23:43:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
The truth will come out with time.
After the Dems take the Presidency there will be a rush of Bush insiders desperate to trade evidence in exchange for immunity from prosecution.
All Bush insiders know Bush will sacrifice them in a heartbeat to save himself and they have all been hiding evidence as a insurance policy.
It will all come out.
2007-09-11 23:46:31 · answer #4 · answered by easy_game_101 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
whats sorry about the answer is if it were americans who pulled it off they would be executed quickly,but before hand they probally be purposely put in the worse prison for awhile so they can be tormented by ruthless,gay cons until they get executed.but the arabs on the other hand go to gitmo and get fat cuz they eat like kings there,get all the korans they can read and ***** and moan about their religous rights being violated.
2007-09-11 23:48:04 · answer #5 · answered by paul s 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
the panel investigating 911 say it wasn't an inside job.
2007-09-11 23:48:21 · answer #6 · answered by soperson 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
be even worst cuz thats our own ppl doing that stuff
2007-09-11 23:45:10 · answer #7 · answered by ricanthuglyp 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Since that was not the case, your question is meaningless.
2007-09-11 23:44:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
It wasn't, so the entire question is silly.
2007-09-11 23:45:12 · answer #9 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The same.............
2007-09-11 23:43:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋